party—perhaps in Detroit—will ask his stockbroker to ascertain on what terms a Call option can be had on a certain stock for, let us say, 90 days. The stockbroker will find this out through his New York office, which in turn gets in touch with an option-dealer for the terms on which a Call option can be had on that particular issue. The option-dealer might quote the contract at a nominal price of $400. This quotation is sent back to the customer in Detroit, and if the quotation meets with his approval, an order will be given to the option-dealer to "buy Call on 100 XYZ at market for 90 days for $400." On receipt of such an order, the option-dealer will get in touch with his clients who might be interested in selling such a contract, and when he has been successful in negotiating the trade, he will report to the stock-exchange firm from whom he received the order: "Sold you Call 100 XYZ at 70 for 90 days for $400 expires October 24." The Call option contract is then delivered to the stock-exchange firm which gave the order and the latter will pay for the contract from the customer's account and hold the contract, subject to instructions by the customer before expiration as to whether or not the option should be exercised. (The cost of federal and state tax will be added to the cost of a Call option. There is no tax required on a Put option.) If the customer wishes to have the option exercised and it happens to be a Call on XYZ at 70, his instructions to his stockbroker will read: "Exercise Call on 100 XYZ at 70 expiring October 24 and sell stock at market;" or if he wishes to exercise his Call contract and carry the stock in his account his instructions should read: "Exercise Call on 100 XYZ at 70 expiring [date] and carry stock in my account." Of course, if he chooses to carry the stock, he will be obliged to margin it according to stock-exchange requirements. If he exercises the Call and at the same time sells the stock, he will be required to deposit only 25 percent Uses of the Call Option Contract The Use of a Call Contract for Speculation 59 50, is going to have a substantial rise. He buys a Call option on 100 shares at 50, good for 90 days, for $350 plus tax. The federal and state tax departments demand that tax stamps be affixed to Call options (but not to Puts). This tax, paid for by the buyer of the option at the time he buys it, is the same amount that would be paid by a seller on a sale of the stock at the Call price. The maximum is $12 per 100 shares and is fixed according to the dollar value of the stock involved. When the trader buys the Call option at 50, good for 90 days, for $350, this amount is the most he can lose, no matter what happens to the stock. If the trader is correct in his judgment and the stock rises to, let us say, 70, before his Call contract expires, he buys the stock by exercising his Call and sells the stock in the market at 70. His profit is $2,000 less the cost of the Call contract, and his account shows: Bought call 100 XYZ at 50 for................... $ 350 Bought 100 shares at 50 thru Call................ 5,000 $5,350 Sold 100 shares at 70 ................................... $7,000 Profit.............. The transaction shows a profit of almost 500 per cent of the $350 at risk. 60 is to his advantage to do so. The seller or maker of the contract has no choice—he must live up to the terms of the contract at the option of the holder of the contract. Closing Out a Contract for Partial Recovery The preceding example of a Call contract for speculation showed a handsome profit. Suppose that when a Call option at 50 was about to expire the stock was selling at 52. While the holder of the Call contract could not recover all of his premium of $350, he could, nevertheless, Call for his stock at 50 and sell it in the market at 52, so instead of losing the $350 premium, he would recover $200 of it. His account would read: Bought Call XYZ at 50-cost................................ $ 350 Bought 100 shares a/c Call ................................ 5,000 $5,350 Sold 100 shares in market 52............................... $5,200 Loss.................... $ 150 (For simplification Stock Exchange commissions have been omitted.) Selling Stock and Buying a Call to Maintain a Position needs the money in his business. However, he does not like to lose his stock position. He might consider the following: He sells his stock at 50, releasing his funds, and at the same time buys a Call option at 50 good for 90 days at a cost of $350.00. If the stock advances, he exercises his Call and thereby re-acquires his stock. He may then sell the stock that he acquired through the Call and take his profit, or he may care to carry the stock at 50 which is now selling in the market at 60. If, on the other hand, the stock declines to 40, he lets the Call option expire and now he can, if it suits him, re-acquire at 40 the stock that he sold in the market at 50. Through the Call contract, he accomplished two things—he released the $5,000 that he had invested and also had control over the same number of shares for the duration of his option, and at the same price that he sold them. The Use of a Call Contract for Trading Purposes Suppose a trader bought a 90-day Call option at the current market price of 50, for which he paid $350, and that the contract was to expire on December 31. Let us also suppose that some time in October the stock rose to 55, at which point the trader sold short 100 shares. This short-sale—and it must be sold as "short" stock—must be margined with his stock-exchange broker, but at this point the trade is risk less. The trader has a 5-point profit less the cost of the Call at any time that he cares to exercise his option. But he doesn't care to exercise his option because it has about 2 months to run and the fluctuations in the market price of the stock in that 2-month period may give him additional opportunities to trade. Let us say that after having made the short-sale at 55, the market declines in another week or so to 50, where Mr. Trader sees fit to buy in or cover his short-sale. His account now looks like this: 62 Sold 100 shares at 55.............................. $5,500 Bought 100 shares at 50............................................. $5,000 Cost of Call Option .................................................. 350 Total Cost .... $5,350 Profit .................... $ 150 But the Call runs until December 31, and the trade which was made does not nullify the option. In another week or so, because of some news, the stock rallies to 56, where Mr. Trader again sees fit to sell short. Again he has a riskless, profitable transaction, and in a week or so the stock again declines to 50, at which point the short-sale is covered. On this trade another profit of $600 is added to the $150 already made. Sold 100 shares at 56 ....................................... $5,600 Bought 100 shares at 50 ......................................... 5,000 Profit................... $ 600 63 a profit. Just as a Call can be used to protect a trade for trading purpose, Call options can also be used to: Protect a Short-Sale at Time of Commitment A man feels that a stock now selling at 50 will decline and sells 100 shares short in the market. Not willing to risk an unlimited loss if the stock advances, he buys a Call option at 50, good for 90 days, for which he pays $350. He is now guaranteed through the terms of his Call that he can buy 100 shares at 50 at his option before the contract expires, so if he is wrong, his loss will be limited to the cost of his Call option. Now let's look at the operation both ways: Let's see what happens if the man is right and the stock declines and if he is wrong and the stock goes up instead of down. If the stock should go down to 30, as the man expects, he covers his stock in the market at 30 and takes his 20-point profit. Naturally, he won't want to exercise his Call option to buy stock at 50 because he can buy it better in the market, so he allows his Call option to lapse. He: Sold 100 shares at 50 .......................... $5,000 Bought 100 shares at 30................................. $3,000 Bought Call at 50 ..................................................... 350 $3,350 One might say that he could have made the short-sale without having spent $350 for the protection. Certainly— but suppose that instead of the stock going down to 30, it had gone to 55, 60, 65, and then 70. What then? How far do you let your loss run? Well, some would say, why not sell the stock short and put a "stop loss" order in at 53½? 64 If the stock declined to 30, he would have saved the $350 and his profit would have been $2,000 instead of $1,650. That's fine, but suppose the stock rose to 54 first, stopped out the man's short-sale with a loss of $350 or $400, and then declined to 30. His original idea was correct—the stock did decline to 30—but the stop-loss order for protection was more costly than the Call option. If he had had the Call option, the rally to 54 would not have worried him because he would have been guaranteed through his contract that he could cover at 50, but the stop-loss order caused him a quick and definite loss. The Use of a Call Option to Average 65 he sold both the stock that had cost him 40 and the stock that had cost him 20, which he had on Call, his account would look like this: Bought 100 shares at 40 .................... $4,000 Bought Call 100 shares at 20 .................... 225 Bought 100 shares at 20 a/c Call................ 2,000 $6,225 Sold 200 shares at 35 ................................... $7,000 Profit.............. $ 775 Protect Profit in a Call by Buying a Put Or, say that in the remaining 30 days of his Call, the stock continues to rise and goes to 80. He then has a profit of $3,000 less the two premiums of $750, or a net profit of $2,250. This treatment can be varied by the purchase of two Puts instead of one. 66 The uses of options are limited only by ones ability and ingenuity. Buying Stock and Call at the Same Time A stock is selling at 50. and the man buys a Call at 50 on 100 shares for 90 days for $350. At the same time, he buys 100 shares in the market at 50 (which he must margin). If the stock advances to 55 in a few weeks and he sells his stock, he has made $500, less commission, which will about pay for the Call option. Now he has his option at 50 the stock is selling at 55 and the Call cost him nothing, with some time for the Call still to run. From here until the time the contract expires, he may trade to his heart's content above the Call price for he has his Call as protection. He may sell short at 60, cover at a lower price, then sell again and cover again as long as there is a profit. If the stock goes up after a short sale, he can always use his Call to cover his short sale. Trading in Odd Lots Against a Call their orders to sell against an option which they hold. For instance, take a man who owns a Call option on 100 shares at 50, good for 90 days, for which he paid $350; his idea of trading is to sell 50 shares short at 60, and maybe Explanation of Chart CHRYSLER Take, for example, a man who bought 100 Chrysler on August 20, 1957, at 80. By November 20 (or in 90 days) he would have had a loss of $1,400, and in 6 months his loss would have been $3,000. Compare his position with that of a man who bought a 90-day Call contract on 100 Chrysler at 80 on August 20, at the market for $500. Let us suppose also that this last man bought a 6-month Call at 80 on August 20 for which he paid $750. Neither the 90-day Call nor the 6-month Call would have shown a profit. The man who bought the Call options was as wrong in his market judgment as the first man, and he lost the money that he paid for the Calls—but that money was the limit of his risk. Now, after Chrysler declined, the man who had bought the Calls instead of the stock and had drawn from the equity in his account only the cost of the Call contract, was in a position to buy the actual stock at a much lower price than when he first became bullish on it. Even though the purchase of the Calls was unprofitable, it saved him from buying the stock at the original high price. As another example, suppose a man was bullish on Chrysler in the third week in July, 1958. The stock, according to the chart, sold at 46½. At that time he could have bought a 90-day Call contract at 46½ (the price at which it was selling) for $350. During the life of the Call the stock advanced, and in the third week in October, when his Call expired, the stock sold at 58. He could have exercised his Call at 46½ and at the same time sold the stock at 58, thereby making approximately 11½ points, less the cost of his option and commission for buying and selling the stock. The records show also that 6-month-and-10-day Calls were bought on October 24, 1958, at 53½ for $600 per 100-share Call, when the stock was selling at that price. On May 4, 1959, when the Call expired, the stock was selling at 68, showing a profit of $1,450, less the cost of the Call and stock-exchange commissions for buying and selling the stock.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 shares short at 65. Of course, he must deposit margin with his stockbroker to take such a position, and he may be able to trade back and forth before the expiration of the option and complete many trades. If, after selling 50 shares short at 60 and 50 shares short at 65, the market continues to rise to 70 or 75, he just exercises his option at expiration and his account will look like this:
Bought Call 100 shares at 50................ $ 350
Bought 100 shares at 50 through Call.... 5,000
Sold 50 shares at 60 ...................................... $3,000
Sold 50 shares at 65 ...................................... 3,250
Total proceeds $6,250
Profit ............. $ 900
Notice the profit against the cost of the option (notice the leverage) and the percentage gain; at no time was the risk greater than the cost of the option contract.
Suppose that, before the Call expires and after selling 50 shares short at 60 and 50 shares short at 65, the stock declines to 45. At this point it would be more advantageous to the trader to buy the stock in the market to cover his short-sale than to exercise his Call option. He buys 100 shares at 45 to cover his short-sale and allows his Call to lapse. His account then looks like this:
Sold 50 shares at 65 ........................... $3,250
Sold 50 shares at 60 ............................ 3,000
Bought Call at 50 .......................................... $ 350
Bought 100 shares at 45 ................................ 4,500
$6,250 $4,850
Profit............. $1,400
The following illustrates this. A man who expects a stock which is selling at 50 to rise, buys a Call option at 50, good for 6 months and 10 days, for $500. Notice the price of $500 for a 6-month option as compared to a 90-day contract for $350. The proportion is about like that—double the length of the contract for about 50 per cent more. If the expected rise materializes and the stock goes to, say, 70 after Mr. Trader has held the contract for over 6 months, he sells his Call contract instead of exercising it. We (and most option-dealers) will always be interested in buying a profitable option; in such instances, we will purchase the Call and exercise it for our own account (50), and sell the stock in the market (70) for our own account. The purchase price which we will pay for the Call will be equal to our net proceeds ($2,000.00), less two regular stock exchange commissions and any applicable tax. In selling such a contract, it has not been necessary to deposit margin with the option-dealer. It is my understanding that, in such transactions, the selling option-holder has ordinarily treated the profit as long term capital gain on the sale of a contract held for more than six months.
It must be carefully noted, however, that if the holder of the contract exercises his option at 50 and at the same time sells the stock in the market at 70, such a profit is short-term gain by reason of the fact that the stock was held only one day. The holding period of the stock in this case does not date back to the time of the purchase of the option, but only to the time of actual acquisition of the stock.
Compare the two types of trades:
Bought Call at 50.................................................... $ 500
Sold Call at 50 with stock 70 2,000
Long-Term Profit $1,500
The tax on this would be 25 per cent or $375, leaving a profit after tax of $1,125.
If the Call had been exercised and the stock sold in the market onthesameday,theaccountwouldreadas
follows:
Bought Call at 50......................... Cost $500
Bought stock at 50 by exercise of Call.... 5,000
Sold stock in market at 70 ............................. $7,000
Short-Term Gain..... $1,500
If this man's income put him in the 75 percent bracket, he would pay $1,125 in tax and be left with only $375 net profit after tax. While this procedure is extremely interesting, so is the action taken by the holder of an option that proves unprofitable. If the 6-month option is allowed to lapse, the loss—the cost of the option—is a long-term capital loss. A loss was sustained on a contract which was held over 6 months. However, if the contract which looks as if it will be a loss is sold to another for a nominal sum before the contract is held for 6 months—say 5 months and 20 days, or anything up to 6 months—the loss is a short-term loss.
Bought Call at 50.................................................. $500
Sold Call .............................................................. 1
Loss........................ $499
As a side thought I would like to tell this story. It happened in November, 1957, after the market had had a severe break. A man with a southern drawl and wearing a big ten-gallon hat, walked into our office and wanted to speak to the "boss." "You know," he said, "I bought a lot of your Calls and I tore them up—lost my money." I thought maybe he was going to pull a gun on me. But my fear quickly vanished when he said, "Don't worry-how lucky it was that I bought Calls instead of stock. If I had bought the stocks way up there I would have gone broke." (The Dow Jones averages declined from 520 in July, 1957, to 420 in October.)
But to buy a stock or sell a stock short and be wrong can cost a lot of money.
The Renewal of Options
Just because one holds a Call or a Put option for 90 days is no reason to wait until the last of the option time to act upon it. Many times a stock will rise considerably above the Call price or decline much below the Put price during the time of the option, but the holder of the option who does not take timely advantage of the situation may find that at the expiration most of the profit that had been in the contract has disappeared. For example, the holder of a Call contract at 50 having 20 days left out of a 90-day contract, finds the stock selling at 65, at which price he would have a nice profit if he would close out the contract. But he waits until the last day or near the last day, by which time the stock has declined to 54, wiping out most or all of the profit. A contract can be exercised at any time before the contract expires'.
The Effect of Options on the Stock Market
75
3,000 shares of a stock at 50. If the market declines to 40, and the man who owns the Put option is satisfied with such a profit, he may be a buyer of stock on a scale-down—500 at 40, 500 at 39, 500 at 38, and so on-until he has bought the 3,000 shares of stock covered by his Put option. His purchases strengthened the market on that stock.
Call options also have a stabilizing effect on the market. The holder of Calls which are profitable closes them out by Calling or buying the stock which is specified in the Call contract and selling that stock in the market to complete the trade. A man who owns Call options becomes a supplier of stocks in a rising market. He sells the shares that he Calls in order to make his profit. Whether a man sells against his Calls in a rising market or buys against his Put options in a declining market, his actions are against the trend and, therefore, stabilizing and not destructive.
Effect of Dividends, Rights, and Stock Dividends
On the day that a stock sells ex a cash dividend on the exchange, the prices in all outstanding Put and Call options on that stock will be reduced automatically by the amount of the dividend. For example, the holder of a Put option and a Call option, both at 50, will, on the day that the stock sells ex dividend $1.00 on the Exchange, auto-
76
matically reduce both the Put and the Call option price to 49. While the holder of actual stock would be the recipient of such a dividend when it is payable, the holder of a Call option does not receive the dividend, but reduces the price of his Call option. Conversely, one who is short actual stock when it sells ex dividend would be charged for the dividend, while the holder of a Put contract reduces the price of his contract and pays the dividend only in the form of the reduced price when and if he exercises his contract.
In the case of rights issued on a stock, the prices in all outstanding options are reduced by an amount equal to the price at which the first sale of the rights is made on the day that the stock sells ex rights on the Exchange. Thus, if the first sale of the rights on the day the stock sells ex rights is 1V>>, then the price of outstanding Put and Call contracts would be reduced by 1% points. The stock at the opening on the day that the stock sells ex rights would probably open down l1/^ points so that there would be no advantage to either the buyer or the seller of the options.
Suppose that one owns a Put and a Call at 52 and the company has declared a 5 per cent dividend. From the day that the stock sells ex stock dividend the holder of the Call contract, if and when he exercises his Call, calls for 105 shares of stock for $5,200 (the dollar amount specified in the original contract) and the holder of the Put option, if he exercises his Put, will deliver 105 shares for $5,200 (the total dollar amount specified in the original contract).
As an example: the holder of a Call on 100 shares of
American Motors at 20, with stock selling at 40 after it has sold ex a 5 per cent dividend, would Call for 105 shares of stock for $2,000. Conversely, the holder of a Put on American Motors at 20 if the stock were selling at 10 (after it had sold ex the 5 per cent stock dividend) would Put 105 shares of stock for the sum of $2,000. If the stock has sold ex a 50-cent cash dividend and then ex a 5 per cent stock dividend, the holder of the Call at 20 would reduce his Call price to 19^ and then Call for 105 shares for $1,950.
Percentage of Options Exercised
and bad options, for the matter of convenience we strike them all out." Don't hold me to the exact words, but that was the essence of it and it was my job to show the difference. I think I did a good job. As I have said, the business of options was turned over to the newly formed SEC and, sitting before this body, I explained the difference between "the options in which we deal which are publicly offered and openly sold for a consideration, and the manipulative options that had been secretly given, for no fee but for manipulative purposes."
To get back to the reason for the heading of this section, Mr. Pecora, after other questions, asked me the percentage of options that were exercised, and I told him that about 12½ per cent were exercised at or before expiration. Remember that in those days options were mostly of 30-day duration written not "at the market" price, but away from the market. In those days we also negotiated options for 2 days, 7 days, and 15 days. (More about this later.) But stock prices were high in the twenties (as we later found out), and with General Motors over $300, U.S. Steel over $325, and many stock in the hundreds, it was quite common to trade options 20, 30, or even 40 points away from the market for 30 days.
Mr. Pecora then asked something like this: "If only 12½ per cent are exercised, then the other 87% per cent of the people who bought options have thrown their money away?" "No, sir," I said, "if you insured your house against fire and it didn't burn down you would not say that you had thrown away your insurance premium."
The same thing is true about options. Today the 30-day
option is a very small percentage of our business, and the longer contracts in which we now deal constitute a very much greater percentage of options exercised. However, whether an option is exercised at expiration or not, it does supply considerable protection and advantage to the holder during its life.
"Years Ago"
It might be interesting to the reader at this point, after reading so much of the techniques of the option business, to know something of "years ago."
When I first came into the option business forty years ago, and up until about the time of the "big break" in 1929, the holder of an option could trade against it with no margin. His broker had to have coverage for just the commissions and interest and any market difference. Often I had Puts on 500 shares against which I would
trade, back and forth, as many times as the swings in the market would allow; margin was not necessary because the option, guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange, was sufficient margin. Not so today, however. Today all stock commitments must be covered by the required margin and the option is not a substitute for such margin.
"Years ago," there were no tax stamps required on either the Put or the Call option.
"Years ago," very few option-dealers had their own offices. The "market" was in a restaurant in New Street, New York City, where most of the option-dealers congregated, and many large writers and buyers of options would come to meet with their special option-dealers and give an order. There were telephone booths and a ticker in the restaurant, and the telephone booths were our offices. All the dealers walked around with a pocketful of nickels,
ready to use a phone to call a customer and try to make a trade. (A phone call was still a nickel in those days). Of course, we all ate in that restaurant—we had to, for a customer might call and this was our "office."
"Years ago," we did a very large business in "2-day options." We bought them for $25 or $30 per hundred and sold them for $35 or $37.50. They ran from, say, Monday— that would be at any time Monday that we traded—until Wednesday at 2:45 p.m.—the Exchange closed at 3:00 p.m. in those days. We would buy Calls on some stock 2, 3, 5, 10, or 20 points above the market for 2 days. But the number of points demanded for a Call was in proportion to the way the stocks were moving. And if you knew which pool was going to move which stock in the next 2 days, you could do well. There was a broker in the business who would sell a Call on 100 shares of stock good, for the next day only, for one dollar's worth of cigars (which were seven for a dollar, then). The idea was to buy one of those "seven-cigar Calls" and about noon the next day, if the stock had had a run, to sell it for $25 or more—just for the rest of the day. I saw one of my colleagues make $1,200 on a call like that.
82
days and stocks weren't split so quickly. Some of the leading stocks sold over $300—General Motors, Mexican Petroleum, Texas Company moved 10-20-30 points in a day. I remember selling a man Puts on General Motors and Mexican Petroleum 30 points below the market for 30 days. Those Puts cost $137.50 per hundred shares, but the next day or so those stocks were down 40 points and the next day they were up 30.1 sold a fellow a Call on Radio once for 30 days at 100-the stock was 89 and the Call cost $137.50. There were 100 points in the Call when it was exercised.
"Years ago," I remember trading a Call on 10,000 shares of Pan American Pete at 11:00 p.m. at night. When I first started, I did the trading, I made out the contracts in ink—
who owned a typewriter?—I made out the checks, I delivered the contract, I picked up the checks and made the deposits, I opened the shop and closed the shop; I was the business. But all of the option-dealers did very well. After a while I chipped in with another broker and we hired a boy for $15 a week to stand at some phone booths in a nearby building (these phone booths were our branch office), and if we were wanted on the phones down the street our boy would come running after one of us "big shots" and whoever was wanted would run up to answer "his" phone. What fun if the restaurant phone wanted you at the same time!
But we had a peculiar sense of honor in those days. If I was sick for a time, one of my competitors would answer my calls and do business for me, and upon my return to work, he would give me a list of the trades he had made for me, along with a check for my profits. And though every one of us was a competitor and would try to offer an option better than the next fellow, the broker who took care of the sick fellow's customers would not, on the latter's recovery, solicit business from his fellow broker's customers. It just wasn't cricket. I had pneumonia once after I had been in business about four years. At the time I was trying to follow a buying pool—only I didn't know that it was selling in another place. I lost my money and worried about my wife and kid, and got sick and contracted pneumonia. I was home for about four weeks, one of my competitors took care of my business and wouldn't take more than a "thank you" for it.
While Istill had my office in my hat—I meanthe
restaurant—I made a trade in 500 shares with an English fellow I had seen around "the shop," and as he said, "I'll take it," he winked his eye. Trying to be careful because I couldn't afford to make a mistake, I asked him again if it was a trade and again he said, "I'll take it," but gave another wink. I went over to one of the boys and asked him about this fellow, who, every time he said, "I'll take it," winked at me. They reassured me that the sale was O.K.—he just had a nervous twitch—but I was scared.
Despite the length of time I've been in this business, I can remember almost all of the mistakes that were made in trading, they were that few. It's amazing because of the millions of shares of options that are traded: a Put is a Put and not a Call; 100 is 100 and not 500; and Steel is Steel and not Studebaker. I hope I don't jinx it, but I can't remember a serious mistake in our office in almost 10 years.
Just to show how mistakes were not made—often we would call a certain seller of options at his home at 7 p.m. (he was a fellow who had quite a thirst—so much so, that his tongue thickened) and we'd trade a thousand or two with him, and next morning our contracts would come in 100 per cent perfect—just as they had been traded. I don't think there is another business in the whole wide world that has had as few errors in the last forty years as the option business. And it's fast—we've over 50 phones on our trading table, and on a fast day the twelve ears and twelve hands that our six traders have can't stop for a minute; still, I think it should get an "Oscar" for being the least understood of all Wall Street businesses.
86
|
|
|
![]() |
|||||
most favorable time to close their contracts, that if we would attend to not only securing the privilege, but the selection of the stock, and closing the same, using our best judgment, they would be willing to forward their money to us for investment. We reply, that when requested, we will not only secure the privilege, but make the selection of stock and the kind of contract best to be taken, and also attend to the closing of same, exercising our best judgment. We are enabled to do this without prejudice to our customers, as our business is done strictly on commission, and we are entirely disinterested when we give our views of the market, which we never do until after studying the movements of the different cliques, and watching the outside influences that may be brought to tear on the market. It is to our interest as well as our customers', to select such stocks as are most likely to pay the best profits, for as we make money for them, we make it for ourselves, by increasing our business; and all who trust us with their business may rest assured that we will attend promptly and faithfully to their interest.
present such facts before our readers from week to week as may come into our possession, and give them our best judgment as to the probable course of the market for the ensuing thirty days, and we say to them, if you choose to risk $106.25, you may realize a considerable profit. The stock broker who buys and sells for his customers can do no more than this. If he is consulted and is candid, he will tell his client what he thinks as to the prospects of a stock, desiring him at the same time to exercise his own judgment. He does not guarantee profits or promise success by any means. Those of our patrons who have followed the course of our suggestions, will agree with us when we state that our prognostications have generally proved correct, and when they have taken our advice, success has resulted in nine cases out of ten.
repay the losses on a great number of unprofitable ones. So the ball of speculation once in motion is easily kept rolling, and gains at every turn.
TUMBRIDGE & CO.,
BANKERS AND BROKERS, 2 "Wall St., N. Y.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUGGESTIONS.
---------- ■ ♦—■
Ff you are undecided which way a stock is going, always take a " Spread ;" it costs $212.50, and pays a profit if the stock goes up or down.
To take an interest in several different stocks will generally be successful; in the numerous fluctuations which occur everyday, you are certain to make a handsome profit on some of them.
Where a stock has once been in price, you may look for it to sell there again at some time.
Short Of Stocks.—To be "Short (f Stocks," or a "Bear," means that you have sold for a decline, stocks, which you have not in your possession, but your Broker borrows for delivery.
Long Of Stocks.—The expression being " Long of Stocks," or a "Bull," means that you have bought for a rise, and that the shares are in possession of your broker.
Our long experience in stock operations gives us many advantages, and coming in contact with the great stock manipulators, we are often able to judge of the future market and give our customers very valuable information and advice, enabling them to act upon it.
We are always careful to make contracts on parties of undoubted responsibility, and our customers can always obtain the name of the party from whom we have bought or sold contracts or stocks for their account.
The best stocks to secure contracts on are those in which the greatest activity is anticipated. When requested, we will make the investment in such stocks as, in our judgment, will give the largest returns, and will act for parties in securing the profits.
Contracts Left "With Us we will operate against either by buying or selling, in order to secure the various fluctuations of the day. Our customers are entitled to our services in the selection of the style of investment most likely to prove profitable for their account without extra commission charges.
If you think stocks are going down secure a Put; or you can obtain a Call and sell the stocks short against it.
If you think stocks are going up, secure a Call, or you can obtain a Put, and buy the stock against it.
When a telegraphic order is received by us and we have no funds to the credit oi the person sending such order, a check on New York, payable to our order, must be received by us by first mail.
We can always make returns the same day a contract is closed.
Extensions or renewals must be secured before the expiration of the original contract.
No Liability.—There is no liability, or risk, beyond the amount paid for a privilege.
Register all mone letters, send large amounts by express or draft on New York, and address all communications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
demand the stock. If on the other hand the stock should decline, and not advance above the price named in the Call, the only loss that can possibly occur is the amount that may have been paid for the contract.
|
|
Every one per cent. Union Pacific advances above the price named, viz.: 43 is equal to $100 on each hundred shares, so an advance of five per cent., the contract would be worth Five Hundred Dollars, an advance of ten per cent, would be a thousand dollars, and so on. This is always the case. One per cent, on a stock that is worth in the market only 15, amounts to just as much as on a stock that is worth 110, because it is always the par value of a stock that is referred to, and not the selling value.
March 29th, 100 "0. P. sold C6, less 1/8 Commissions. $6,587.50
March 29th, 100 U. P., called at 43................................ 4,300 00
$2,287 50
Deduct cash paid for Call at 43 and Commissions......... 106. .25
|
|
Profit on the transaction................................................ $2.181.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PUT contact is the very reverse of a Call—the holder having the right to deliver stock to the signer of the contract at a fixed price before its expiration. The maker of the contractistheonly party bound, so |
Consequently the market or actual selling price of the stock when Put will be less than the Put price. If you hold " a Put," viz, the right to deliver Jones 100 shares of stock for which he agrees to pay you $4,500 and you can buy that stock in the market for $2,500, it is very clear you make the difference between $2,500 and $4,500. Therefore, when Puts are bought, a decline in the market is expected, and the profits are made from the decline. The details of a transaction of this kind, such as furnishing the money to buy the stock, and making the delivery to the signer of the contract, is always carried out by your broker. The last few years puts have resulted very profitably. Every time the market has advanced it has been follow d by a greater decline.
not closed until the day of its expiration, when the stock was selling for 61, at which price we bought 100 shares and delivered
|
|
|
|
THE SELLING OF OPTION CONTRACTS Selling Call Options Against a Portfolio
I remember lecturing in Chicago some years ago, and after this talk, during a question-and-answer period, one of my audience said, "I have bought options, but I never knew I could sell them." Well, for every trade—whether in options or clothing or real estate—there must be both a buyer and a seller. It is usually very interesting to my audiences to learn where options come from, who makes them, and why. I'll try to explain the selling of options, the advantages to the seller, the disadvantages, and the pitfalls, for I said at the outset that I would show the good side and the bad.
Options are sold by individuals, funds, trusts and insurance companies, and—as I like to say—by anyone who has what I call "a continuous portfolio of common stocks." One who sells options must be percentage-minded—the man who buys a stock at 50 and expects to get 150 for it is not a prospective seller of options, but the man who is satisfied to take a premium of, say, $300 and for that give a Call on his stock for 90 days, and then repeat that procedure over and over again, is percentage-minded and could do well. It is my contention that the selling of options against a portfolio is no more speculative than is the owning of such common stocks.
Consider, if you will, a man (or an institution) who owns 1,000 shares of a stock selling at 50. He sells a Call, good for 90 days, at 50, for which he receives $300 per 100 share Call. This $300 he receives as soon as he sells
97
the option. Let's see what happens if the stock goes up, and also what happens if the stock goes down.
If the stock goes down and is below the Call price when the option expires, the Call will not be exercised. The seller of the Call will still have his stock and will have profited by the $300 which he received for the Option. If he can sell such an option four times a year (and there are four 90-day periods in a year), he will make $1,200 in premiums, or almost 25 per cent per annum on the $5,000 investment.
Let's look at the other side: the stock advances and the stock is selling above the Call price when, or before, the option expires. The stock is "Called" and the seller of the option must deliver stock at 50, less any dividends. He then has:
Sold 100 shares at 50 ....................................... $5,000
Received $300 for Call ........................................... 300
Total Received ... $5,300
It is just as simple as that and quite automatic. One shouldn't sell a Call at one time and for one expiration date
on all of his stock, but should try to sell a Call on part today, at today's price, and a Call on part of his holdings at a later date at the current market price in an attempt to have staggered prices and options expiring on different dates, like this:
Sold call 200 at 50, expiring June 20 Premium ................. $600
Sold call 200 at 52 expiring July 7 Premium .................... 600
Sold call 300 at 54 expiring July 18 Premium................... 900
I believe that there are two pitfalls to avoid in the selling of options: (1) Never sell a Call option unless you own the stock, and (2) Never sell a Put option without the wherewithal to pay for the stock in case it is Put to you. Otherwise, the risk in selling options is no greater, in my opinion —arrived at through years of experience—than the risk in owning like common stocks. For instance, if one had sold Calls freely in the beginning of 1958 without owning the stocks, he could have been Called for stock at 50 when it was selling at 80. If one had sold Puts in the summer of 1957 without having sufficient cash to pay for the stock when it was Put to him, he might have had stock Put to him at 50 when it was selling at 30. The return to be had by selling options almost on an investment basis is interesting enough without looking for additional income and additional grief by trying to gain additional premiums.
Before going into the selling of Put options, Straddles, Spreads, Strips and Straps—a word about margins. The New York Stock Exchange has set minimum initial margin requirements for the sale of options by customers of its member firms. However, these member firms may increase these requirements according to house policy. The mini-
mum initial margin for the selling of a Put option is 25 per cent of the Put option price, unless the account is "short" the stock which is already adequately margined. The minimum initial margin requirement for the sale of a Call option is 30 per cent of the stock on which the Call is written, unless the Call is written on stock already "long," in which case the "long" stock is already adequately margined. The minimum initial margin requirement for the sale of a combination Put and Call (Spread or Straddle) where there is no stock position, is the larger of the two requirements for the separate Put or Call, or 30 per cent.
When an option is exercised, however, thereby creating a stock position, the position must be fully margined according to stock-exchange requirements.
The Sale of Put Options
An individual (or a company) has $100,000 which he would invest in common stocks. He could buy these stocks in the market or he could sell Put options in an attempt to acquirethe stocksa few pointsbelow thecurrent
market price or to earn premiums from the sale of Put options against the money that he is willing to invest.
For an example: With a stock selling at 50, a man (or a company) sells a Put option at 50 for 90 days, receiving a premium of $300 for each 100-share Put contract. For the $300-premium which he receives at the time that he "makes" the Put contract, he agrees to buy 100 shares at 50 before expiration of the option if the holder of the option cares to deliver it to him. The maker of the Put has no choice—he must receive and pay for the stock if it is Put to him. The option is with the holder of the contract. If, before or at the expiration of the option the holder of the contract cares to deliver the stock, the maker of the option must buy 100 shares at 50, which price is reduced by the $300 he received for the option, making the cost to him 47. If the stock is above the Put price, the holder of the Put option will not deliver stock and the writer or maker of the option has benefited by the $300 received for the contract. Here, too, it must be remembered that if it is possible to sell four such Put options in a year (there are four 90-day periods in a year), the annual return will be $1,200 on a possible investment of $5,000.
The operation can be worked on a number of shares of stock or stocks up to the point where the total amount to be paid for the stocks (if the holders of the Puts exercise them), less the premiums received, equals the amount of cash held for investment. To illustrate:
101
100 A at 50.................... $5,000
100 B at 50...................... 5,000
100 C at 50...................... 5,000
100 D at 50...................... 5,000
100 E at 50................... 5,000
100 F at 50.................... 5,000
100 G at 50...................... 5,000
100 H at 50...................... 5,000
100 I at 50..................... 5,000
100 J at 50..................... 5,000
Total Cost..... $50,000
$3,000. At the expiration of the options, no Puts are exercised, and he has earned $3,000 on his possible investment of $50,000 of cash he is holding for investment, at an annual rate of about 24 per cent.
If the Put options are exercised, he will have an account such as this:
Bought 100 A on a/c of Put ........ $5,000
Bought 100 B on a/c of Put ........ 5,000
Bought 100 C on a/c of Put ......... 5,000
Bought 100 D on a/c of Put ......... 5,000
Bought 100 E on a/c of Put ......... 5,000
Bought 100 F on a/c of Put ......... 5,000
Bought 100 G on a/c of Put ......... 5,000
Bought 100 H on a/c of Put ......... 5,000
Bought 100 I on a/c of Put ....... 5,000
Bought 100 J on a/c of Put ....... 5,000
Total Cost ........................ $50,000
Less Premiums Received... 3,000
Net Cost .......................... $47,000
Mr. A's list cost him $50,000, while Mr. B. has acquired the same stocks at a cost of $47,000. It isn't likely that the situation would work out this all-or-none way; probably some Puts would be exercised, some not. But the principle is clear.
Conversely, if a man owns stock which he would be willing to sell, he sells Call options, and the premium which he receives enhances the selling price if the Call is exercised; if it is not exercised, the premium adds to the income on the stock which he holds.
Buy 100 Shares and Sell Straddle or Buy 200 Shares
(1) At the expiration of the contract (neither side having been exercised prior to that date), the market price for the stock is just about the Straddle price. This rarely happens, but it can and sometimes does.
Neither the Put nor the Call is exercised and Mr. B. has gained the $700 premium.
(2) The stock is selling below 70, the Put price,
and Mr. B. will have 100 shares delivered to him on
thePutoption,whichwill makehispositionas
follows:
Bought 100 shares in market at 70.................... $7,000
Had 100 shares Put at 70..................................... 7,000
Net Cost ........................... $14,000
Less premium ........................................ 700
Net Cost of 200 Shares...... $13,300
(3) The stock is above the Call price (70) and Mr.
B. will have his 100 shares called from him at 70. His
account will look like this:
Sold 100 shares (through Call) at 70..................... $7,000
Sold Straddle 100 shares—premium...................... 700
$7,700
Bought 100 shares in market at 70........................ $7,000
Profit................ $ 700
The first situation needs no discussion as it rarely happens. If it does, however, Mr. B. is at liberty to sell another Straddle, having profited by the premium of $700 on an actual investment of $7,000 and a possible invest ment of $7,000 on the outstanding Put option—or at the rate of 20 per cent per annum.
In the third situation, we know that Mr. B. made $700.
The owner of 100 shares of a stock may be willing either to buy more shares of the stock or to sell out at a premium. In such a situation he can sell a Straddle. A Straddle, as previously defined, is a combination of a Put and a Call, both at the market price of the stock. Let us say that a man sold a Straddle on XYZ at 50 for 90 days, and for it received $500 per 100-share Straddle. By selling the Straddle, he has contracted: (1) to sell 100 shares at 50 any time within 90 days when Called by the holder of the Straddle; (2) to buy 100 shares at 50 any time within 90 days if the holder of the Straddle Puts stock to him. If the Call is exercised, he will have sold his stock at 50 plus the $500 that he received for the option. If the Put is exercised, he will have bought stock at 50, which price is reduced to 45 by the $500 premium. But, you may ask,
105
cannot both the Put and the Call be exercised—first the Call before expiration and then, after the Call has been exercised and still before expiration, the Put? Yes, that can happen. A Straddle consists of a Put and a Call—both separate contracts—and the exercise of one does not void the remaining contract. What would be the result to the writer of the Straddle if both contracts were exercised? Well, in the example cited, the trader started with 100 shares. That stock was called, leaving him with no stock, but subsequently he had 100 shares Put to him, so after he sold 100, he then bought 100, and this brought him back to his original position of 100 shares. Finally, he was ahead by the $500 premium which he received.
Selling a Spread Option
On the other hand, if the stock declined and the Puts were exercised, he would have to buy 200 additional shares at 50, which price would be reduced to 461/2 on each 100 by reason of the $700 premium received. Therefore, the question must be asked by the seller of a Strip, "Would I
107
be willing to lose my stock at 57 and/or would I be willing to buy 200 additional shares at 461/2 ?" The increased premium for a Strip gives a higher selling price in case the Call is exercised. If the two Puts are exercised, the $700 premium received reduces the cost of the stock by 31/2 points for each 100-share Put. Whether a Straddle or a Strip should be sold (assuming that it is possible to sell a Strip) depends on the "market feel" of the seller of the contract.
Selling a Strap
The reverse of the Strip and, also, a cousin of the Straddle is the Strap. It is a form of option contract that was unknown a dozen years ago. It is merely a combination of a Put on 100 shares and Call on 200 shares. To make a comparison: if a Straddle—one Put and one Call—will bring a premium of $500, and a Strip will bring a premium of $700, a Strap will bring a premium of about $800. If the Calls are exercised, the seller of the Strap will have to sell 200 shares at 50, which price will be increased by the $800 premium to an average sale price of 54. However, if the market declines and the one Put is exercised, the maker of the Strap will have to "take" or buy 100 shares at 50, but this price will be reduced to 42 also by reason of the $800 premium which he received for the sale of the Strap.
Selling Call Options Against Convertible Bonds, Warrants, or Preferred Convertible Stocks
Sold 100 shares stock at 643/8.......... $6,437.50
Received for Call 100 shares ..... 500.00
Value of remaining shares (8.7)
(minimum value) .................. 560.00
will be above the Call price $7,497.50
Profit................. $497.50
A study of convertible features of securities might disclose other such opportunities.
The Sale of 6-Month-10-Day-Options
The tax law says, in effect, that the premiums received from the sale of an option must be held in abeyance until the expiration or the exercise of the option. If the contract expires, the premium is ordinary income to the seller of the option. If the option is exercised and it is a Call, the premium is an addition to the proceeds of the sale and, hence, increases the gain, or decreases the loss, on the sale. If the option is exercised and it is a Put, the premium decreases the cost of the stock and, hence, will increase the gain or decrease the loss on the ultimate sale of the stock. The gain or loss on the sale of the stock may be either long term, or short term, depending on the length of time the stock has been held. If a 90-day Call option is sold on a stock after the stock has been held 30 days and the Call is exercised, the time of holding the stock would amount, in all, to approximately 4 months and the gain, if any (including the premium received for the sale of the Call), would be taxed as short-term gain. If the stock in question had been held for over three months when the Call was sold and the Call was exercised at expiration, then the stock in question would have been held for more than 6 months, and any profit, plus the premium received from the sale of the Call, would have been long-term gain. For that reason options are sold for 6 months and 10 days, or longer. It may be that the prospective seller of options
does not own the stock for which a Call is bid, but is willing to buy such stock and then sell the Call which is wanted. If a stock is selling at 50 and a 6-month-and-10-day Call contract is bid for, the prospective seller of the Call may buy stock in the market so as to sell the Call. Of course, if the Call is not exercised, the premium received is ordinary income.
But let us explore the tax possibilities if the Call is exercised. Let us assume that a man has bought stock at 50 and has sold a 6-month-and-10-day Call for, let us say, $500. The stock, held for more than 6 months, has gone up to 70 and is Called. The seller has a $500 long-term profit. However, the alert trader may be able to get a sizeable tax benefit. Before the Call is exercised but when the stock has been held for more than 6 months, he may sell his stock in the market and take a long-term profit of $2,000. But he still owes stock at 50 on account of the Call which he sold. After having sold his stock at 70 to take a long-term gain, he immediately repurchases stock at 70, and this stock he delivers on his Call a few days later, when the Call is exercised. He now has a $2,000 long-term gain and a short-term loss of $2,000, less the premium of $500 which he received for the Call—a $2,000 long-term gain and a $1,500 short-term loss.
Just as a buyer of an option can capitalize, tax-wise, on
a long-term option which he bought, so the seller of an option can benefit through proper treatment of options which he has sold. Of course, there is no guarantee that the holder of a long-term Call option will wait till the expiration of his 6 months "plus" before exercising his contract. It may be that a stock could go from 50 to 75 or 80 in half the life of the option, and the holder of the contract, not wanting to lose his profit, may exercise his contract. In such a case the holder of the stock on which the Call was sold may want to buy an additional 100 shares of stock to deliver against the Call and thus maintain his long position in the original stock until it becomes long-term gain.
A summary of the income tax treatment of premiums paid for by the buyer of options and those received by the seller of options has been added as an appendix. This review of tax treatment has been prepared by a leading New York tax-expert and is based on the 1954 tax law as amended and now current.
In conclusion, may I reiterate that I do not contend that all those interested in securities must trade in Put and Call options. I do feel, however, that this part of Wall Street procedure should be understood by all those who trade in securities, since a time may well come when such understanding can be put to good use in their securities transactions. It is my hope that this book has shed light on the option business, for those who are interested in securities and knew nothing about options, and also for those who had just a little knowledge of the business and wanted to know more about it.
APPENDIX
OF "PUT" AND "CALL"OPTION
TRANSACTIONS
Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954
Revenue Ruling 58-234
Prepared by
© 1958 Put & Call Brokers & Dealers Association, Inc.
113
Description of Transaction
A. As to the purchaser (optionee) of put
1.
Tax treatment of amount paid for put (premium)
prior to its being exercised or its expiration
2.
Tax treatment of amount paid for put (premium)
when put is not exercised but is held to expiration
3. Tax treatment of amount paid for put (premium) when put is exercised
4. Acquisition of a put as a short sale
114
Income Tax Treatment
Amount paid is capital loss for the year in which the put expired by limitation of time. If put has been held for not more than 6 months loss is short-term. If it has been held for more than 6 months loss is long-term. (Specific provision in Section 1234 I.R.C. 1954.) But if transaction falls within exception in (5) the amount paid is an addition to the cost of the related stock.
Upon exercise of put the purchaser (optionee) sells the property to which the put relates to the writer (optionor) for the option price. The amount paid for the put is a reduction of the proceeds of sale.
115
Description of Transaction
I. PUTS (Continued)
A. As to the purchaser (optionee) of put (continued)
5. Exception if put is acquired on same date as related security is purchased
B. As to writer (issuer or optionor) of put
If put is acquired on the same day on which the security identified as intended to be used in exercising the put is acquired, and if the put, if exercised, is exercised through the sale of the property so identified, the acquisition of the put is not treated as a short sale. However, if the put is not exercised, the cost of the put must be added to the cost of the related stock (Section 1233(c) I.R.C. 1954). An informal and unpublished ruling holds that, if taxpayer sells the put instead of exercising it, the exception of Section 1233 (c) will not be applicable and the acquisition of the put will be considered a short sale.
Amount received is to be carried in a deferred account. No tax consequences until put is exercised or expires.
Description of Transaction
I. PUTS (Continued)
B. As to writer (issuer or optionor) of put (continued)
2. Tax treatment of amount received for writing or issuing put (premium) when put is not exercised but expires
3. Tax treatment of amount received for writing or issuing put (premium) when put is exercised by purchaser thereof
(a) Holding periodof security purchased by exercise of put by purchaser thereof
II. CALLS
A. As to purchaser (optionee) of call
1. Tax treatment of amount paid for call (premium)
prior to its being exercised or its expiration
2. Tax treatment of amount paid for call (premium)
when call is not exercised but is held to expiration
Amount received constitutes ordinary income for the year in which the failure of the holder to exercise the option becomes final. This is so, because, under Section 61,1.R.C. 1954, all income is ordinary income unless otherwise provided, and Section 1234, which deals with options to buy and sell, contains no reference to the gain from the failure to exercise an option.
Upon exercise of put, the writer (optionor) buys the security at the option price. The amount received for writing the option (premium) constitutes an offset against the amount paid in determining the net cost basis of the security purchased.
Holding period of the security purchased starts the date the put is exercised, and not the date the put was issued.Amount paid is to "be carried to a deferred account as a capital expenditure made in an incompleted transaction entered into for profit."
Amount paid is capital loss for the year in which the call expired by limitation of time. If call has been held for not more than 6 months, loss is short-term. If it has been held for more than 6 months, loss is long-term (specific provision in Section 1234 I.R.C. 1954).
119
Description of Transaction
II. CALLS (Continued)
A. As to purchaser (optional) of call (continued)
3. Tax treatment of amount paid for call (premium)
when call is exercised
(a) Holding period of security acquired through exercise of call
4. Acquisition of call as short sale
5. Call as substantially identical property
6. Tax treatment if call is sold
B. As to writer (issuer or optionor) of call
1. Treatment of amount received for writing or issuing call (premium) prior to its being exercised or its expiration
120
Income Tax Treatment
Amount paid is an addition to the cost of the stock purchased on the exercise of the call.
Holding period of the security purchased starts on the date the call is exercised and not the date the call was acquired.
The acquisition of a call (unlike the acquisition of a put) does not constitute a short sale. Section 1233(b) does not relate to calls.
The call and the related security are not substantially identical properties. Hence, gain on sale of call held for more than 6 months is long-term gain, even though a short sale of the related security was made during period call was held. (Letter ruling dated February 27, 1957, published in Tax Services)
Gain or loss on sale is capital gain or loss (except in the case of a dealer); long-term if call has been held for more than 6 months, short-term if held for not more than 6 months. Short sale of related security does not kill holding period (see [5] above). (Section 1234, I.R.C. 1954)
Amount received is to be carried in a deferred account. No tax consequences until call is exercised or expires.
Description of Transaction
II. CALLS (Continued)
B. As to writer (issuer or optionor) of call (continued)
2. Tax treatment of amount received for writing or issuing call (premium) when call is not exercised but expires
3. Tax treatment of amount received for writing or issuing call (premium) when call is exercised
122
Income Tax Treatment
Amount received constitutes ordinary income for the year in which the failure of the holder to exercise the option becomes final. This is so, because, under Section 61,1.R.C. 1954 all income is ordinary income unless otherwise provided and Section 1234, which deals with options to buy and sell, contains no reference to the gain from the failure to exercise an option.
Upon exercise of call, the writer (optionor) sells the security at the option price. The amount received for writing the option (premium) is added to the amount received as the option price, in arriving at the gain or loss on the sale of the security. (IT 3835 C.B. 1947-1, p. 53)
123
Description of Transaction
III. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Adjustments for cash dividends, stock rights, stock dividends and stock splits
Income Tax Treatment
Under common trade practice, the purchaser (optionee) of a call who exercises it is entitled to receive from the writer (optionor) an amount equal to all cash dividends, regular or extra, plus the market value of all rights accrued on the security involved (determined on the basis of the first sale of rights on the day the stock sells ex-rights). To reflect this right, the option price is reduced by such amount and the purchaser (optionee) pays the writer (optionor) the adjusted option price. A similar adjustment of the option price is made in the case of a put. In that case, the price which the writer (optionor) pays the purchaser (optionee) is reduced by the amount of such cash dividends and the value of such rights. The number of shares to which the option relates is increased to reflect the additional shares which would be received during the life of the option on the shares originally covered by the option by reason of stock dividends or stock splits and the option price per share is correspondingly reduced, the total option price remaining unchanged. The cash adjustment for cash dividends and rights is not ordinary income but is a reduction of the option price, whether the option price is adjusted or the cash adjustment is made separately. (Revenue Ruling 58-234) (see also IT 4007, C.B. 1950-1, p. 11 and Revenue Rulings 56-153 and 56-211)
125