Understanding Put and Call Options

Understanding

Put and Call

Options

HOW TO USE THEM TO REDUCE RISK IN YOUR STOCK MARKET OPERATIONS

by Herbert Filer

INC.• NEWYORK

© 1959 BY HERBERT FILER

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 59-14028

MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Seventh Printing, July, 1965

Contents


Foreword by Oliver J. Gingold

The Offering of Special Options Straddle Option

Uses of the Put Option Contract Buying a Put Option for Speculation Trading in Odd Lots Against a Put Option Trading Several Times Against an Option Buying a Put Option to Protect a Profit Buying a Put Option to Protect an Initial Commitment Special Tax Factors Covering Put Transactions Purchasing a Put Option to Maintain a Short Position Buying Stock to Make a Long-Term Gain and

a Purchase Using a Put to Make a Long-Term Gain in a Declining

Market


7

18 18 19 31 31 34 41 41 43 44 46 47 48 51 52

53 54

How Option Orders Originate

Uses of the Call Option Contract

The Use of a Call Contract for Speculation

Closing Out a Contract for Partial Recovery

Selling a Stock and Buying a Call to Maintain a Position

The Use of a Call Contract for Trading Purposes

Protect a Short-Sale at Time of Commitment

The Use of a Call Option to Average

Protect Profit in a Call by Buying a Put

Buying Stock and Call at the Same Time

Trading in Odd Lots Against a Call

Buying Long-Term Calls for Tax Benefit

The Renewal of Options

The Exercise of Options Before Expiration

The Effect of Options on the Stock Market

Effect of Dividends, Rights, and Stock Dividends

Percentage of Options Exercised

"Years Ago"

The Selling of Option Contracts

Selling Call Options Against a Portfolio

The Sale of Put Options

Buy 100 Shares and Sell Straddle or Buy 200 Shares

Selling Straddles Against a Portfolio

Selling a Spread Option

Sale of a Strip

Selling a Strap

Selling Call Options Against Convertible Bonds, Warrants, or Preferred Convertible Stocks

55 5S 59 60 61 62 64 65 66 67 67 71 74 75 75 76 78 80

9797 100 103 105 106 107 108 108

110 113

It is strange that a business which has been in existence as long as the business of stock options has never been fully explained, except in leaflet form. As far as I can learn after searching through libraries and college reference books, no complete book has ever been written explain­ing all of the uses and facets of the business. I have written numerous articles about options, including one for and at the request of the Encyclopedia Britannica, and the pres­ent edition contains that explanation of the uses of options. But in this book I propose to give the history of options and the various uses of the Put option contract, the Call option, and their variations and combinations such as the Spread, Strip, Straddle, and Strap. Now I will say simply that a Put option is an option to sell (or "Put") at a specific price within a specified time limit. A Call option is an option to buy (or "Call for") at a specified price within a specified time. These will be thoroughly ex­plained shortly, as will Spreads and Straddles. I will show by example just how they can be used in market opera­tions—their speculative uses and their protective or insur­ance features. I will show that the main advantage in the buying of options is the feature of limited loss and un­limited possible profit. I will also show who "makes" options and why, and the advantages accruing to those who write or make these contracts. Any disadvantages will also be pointed out, because there can be disadvan­tages if certain age-old principles are ignored.

When I read a book on a special subject, I am curious

9

about how qualified the writer is to handle the subject; I suppose the reader might want to know my qualifica­tions for writing this book, so here goes.

Filer, Schmidt & Co., has dealt in nothing but options— "Options Exclusively"—for all these years. Options are not just a department of the firm. In 1932, when the Securities Act was being drawn up, the original attitude of the law­makers was, ". . . not knowing the difference between good options and bad options, for the matter of convenience we strike them all out." At that point the entire option busi­ness was threatened, and by appointment of the Put and Call Brokers and Dealers Association, Inc., I had the privilege of appearing before a committee of the House of Representatives and the committee of finance of the Senate to defend the usefulness and economic value of our business in the securities market. Subsequently, the Securities and Exchange Commission was formed, and the option business was allowed to function "if not in contravention of rules set down by the SEC." In all these years the SEC has not found it necessary to lay down any rules to govern the business of Put and Call options.

Almost all of the option business in this country is done by some twenty-five members of the Put and Call Brokers and Dealers Association, Inc. This association forms rules for the conduct of the business, polices the affairs of its members, arbitrates any differences between its members or between its members and the public, and reports each week to the Securities and Exchange Commission a list

of option trades made by the members of the association. While the options traded through our members run into millions of shares annually, there is rarely a matter which comes before our Board of Arbitration, and seldom is an error made in making a trade.

ized.

Of course, during the years of World War II, there was no trading on the European exchanges, for they were then closed. However, since the end of the war there has been trading on such exchanges where currency is free (for instance, in Switzerland), and today we do considerable option business between New York and Switzerland. It might be of interest to the reader to know that on the London Exchange, where option trading had been dis­continued since the war even though securities, as such, weretraded, the members voted overwhelmingly for options, and actual trading was resumed in October, 1958. London options, however, are different from American contracts in many respects, the two important differences being that options can be traded only between members— not the public—and London options cannot be "done," as they term it, for periods over seven account periods (ap­proximately ninety days). In the United States we do a large part of our option business in six-month options and, occasionally, trade in contracts for one year. And our contracts can be bought or sold by members of an ex­change or the public.

Options are used daily in real estate transactions, and such use is explained here in an attempt to draw a parallel, as near as possible, between options on stocks and options on real estate.

abandon its plans and its loss would be limited to the cost of the options acquired.

As another illustration, let us suppose that Mr. Jones wants to sell a piece of property for $100,000, and Mr. Smith believes that he can sell it to Mr. White for $125,000. Mr. Smith wouldn't want to buy the property and then find that he was unable to sell to Mr. White. So for a relatively small sum he buys an option from Mr. Jones, good for 90 days, to buy the property for $100,000. If, within the 90 days Mr. Smith is successful in making the sale to Mr. White for $125,000, he then exercises his option and buys the property from Mr. Jones according to the terms of his option contract, and sells it to Mr. White. Mr. Smith has made $25,000, less the cost of his option. If, however, he had been unable to sell the prop-

erty to Mr. White, Mr. Smith would have allowed his option to lapse and his loss would have been limited to the cost of the option contract.

Options are used extensively in many businesses today. A ball club has an option on a player, a movie studio on an actor or actress, and you can even choose your own option as to how you wish to have your life insurance paid to your heirs.

Webster's Dictionary gives these definitions of "option":

(1) The exercise of the power of choice.

(2) Power of choosing:the right of choice, an alterna­
tive.

(3) A stipulated privilege of buying or selling a stated
property, securityorcommodity atagiven price
within a specified time.

(4) The right of an insured person to choose the form in
which payments due to him on a policy shall be made
or applied.

In the case of Put and Call stock options, the choice or "option" belongs to the holder of the option contract; he can exercise his contract or not, according to his choice, and he will exercise the option at or before its expiration only if it is to his advantage to do so. The seller of the option has no choice; once he has sold the contract, he must accept stock or deliver stock according to the terms of the option and only at the option of the one who holds the contract.

Arbitrage—Purchasing in one market for immediate sale in another at a higher price.

Hedge—To counterbalance a sale or purchase of one se­curity by making a purchase or sale of another.

Colleges and universities have begun to realize that this subject, which is part of Wall Street procedure, could well be included in a course on finance. I feel that the informa­tion gained through such education will stand the students in good stead when they enter the business world, par­ticularly the field of finance.

It is not my contention that everyone must trade in options, but I do say that anyone who has an interest in securities should have a knowledge of Put and Call options because at some time or other options can play a part in one's security-trading, whether to protect a profit or possibly to recapture stock after taking a profit.

nineteenth century, options in this country acquired the names of "Puts" and "Calls," and they have been dealt in in increasing numbers ever since, for those who deal in securities recognize both their protective and their specu­lative value.

Of course a man wouldn't think of owning a home with­out insuring it against fire; nor would he think of not insuring his wife's jewelry and furs against loss or theft; he carries life insurance to protect his family when he dies. Yet it is strange that relatively few people understand that through Put and Call options they can protect themselves against unlimited loss in stock-holdings, or can preserve substantial "paper" profits without selling. Many of the large losses, either of invested capital or "paper" profits, sustained by traders in the bad breaks in the market that come every now and then, could have been avoided through the protection that is available through options. It has been my experience that small stock-losses do not break a man, but it is the large loss taken by the stubborn trader in a market like that of 1929, 1937, 1946, or 1957 that can wipe out a trader or leave him with little chance to recoup his losses.

Now seems to be the time when options are needed in the field of finance more than ever before because they act as a protection against excessive losses and as a safeguard for profits. It should be made known to every investor and speculator that there is a way to guard against exces-

sive losses by limiting such losses to a specified and rela­tively small amount.

Practically all the orders for the purchase and sale of Put and Call options come to New York, where they are executed by members of the Put and Call Brokers and Dealers Association, Inc. As previously explained, this association consists of approximately twenty-five members who deal exclusively in Put and Call options, and all of the options in which these members deal are guaranteed by member firms of the New York Stock Exchange. The option contracts in which the members deal are transferable contracts, and on the back of each contract is the name of the stock-exchange firm where the individual or company that sold the contract has his account. This endorsement of a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange guar­antees that the terms of the contract will be met. The contract is made out in bearer form and can be resold by one person to another.

Option Contracts

Option contracts are traded in units of 100 shares, not

in odd lots, and they are made for periods of 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, 6 months "plus," and, occasionally, for one year. Puts and Calls are usually done "at the market." That is, the price at which the stock is selling when the trade is made. A Put or a Call on a stock selling at 50 would be made at 50 in the usual way of business. However, it is pos­sible to buy or sell an option "away from the market," that is a Call at 52 when the stock is selling at 50 or any differen­tial by agreement. The most popular contracts are those that run for 90 days or 6 months. A contract can be exercised at any time before expiration at the option of the holder. It is not necessary to wait until expiration to act on or exercise one's option. If a man owns a Call option at 50 which ex­pires on December 10, and by November 20 the stock has risen to 60—at which point he would be satisfied with such a profit—he may exercise his option at that time. He need not wait until the expiration of the contract.

The option money or premium is the amount paid for the contract. The amount paid for the option is not applied to adjust the price at which stock is bought or sold upon the exercise of the option. If you have a Call on stock at 70 and you exercise the option, you pay $70 a share for the stock less any dividends that accrue to the contract. If you have a Put at 70 and you exercise the Put, you receive $70 a share for the stock less any dividends that are due on the option contract.

A Put option is a transferable-bearer contract paid for by the buyer upon delivery of the contract, giving him the right, at his option, to deliver to the maker or seller of the contract a certain number of shares of stock at a fixed price on or before a stipulated date.

In the above contract the holder may deliver to the endorser of the contract 100 shares of XYZ common stock at 70 any time before the expiration date (August 20) at his option.

expiration.

This is the reverse side of a Put contract and will be signed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange, guaran­teeing to the holder of the Put contract that the stock will be accepted if the holder of the Put wishes to exercise his option.

CALLOPTIONCONTRACT

A Call option is a transferable bearer contract paid for by the buyer upon delivery of the contract, giving him the right, at his option, to buy or "Call" from the maker or seller of such

contract a certain number of shares of stock at a fixed price, on or before a stipulated date.

any time before the expiration date (August 20) at his option.

This is the reverse side of a Call contract whereon is put the endorsement or guarantee of a stock-exchange house guarantee­ing to the holder of the Call that the stock specified in the con­tract will be delivered to him, at his option, upon presentation of the Call contract.

THIS IS A QUOTATION SHEET DATED MAY 25, 1959

traded in the over-the-counter market. Anyone interested in the buying or selling of an option can obtain quotations through his stock-exchange broker or directly from an option dealer.

These quotes are nominal. Latest quotations should be obtained

from your Stock Exchange broker, or directly from us.

QUOTATIONS FURNISHED BT

Filer, Schmidt & Co.

ESTABLISHED 1919

Members Put & Call Brokers & Dealers Ass'n, Inc.

THE PUT & CALL MARKET

120 BROADWAY, NEW YORK 5, N. Y. BArclay 7-6100

Allcontractsare endorsed by MembersFirmsoftheNewYorkStockExchange

The following quotations are on the issues that are most active in the Option Market

Other Quotations May Be Had On Request

Price for

Price for

Price for

Price for

90 day

90 day

6 mos.

6 mos.

Put at Market

Call at Market

Put at Market

Call at Market

American Cyanamid

$425.00

$475.00

$550.00

$675.00

Am. Smelt. & Ref.

400.00

450.00

525.00

650.00

Anaconda

450.00

525.00

675.00

750.00

Atchison, T. & S. F.

225.00

275.00

300.00

350.00

Amer. Tel. & Tel. WI

475.00

550.00

700.00

850.00

Bethlehem Steel

350.00

425.00

475.00

550.00

Bait. & Ohio

300.00

350.00

450.00

525.00

Case, J. I., Co.

225.00

275.00

325.00

400.00

Celanese Corp.

275.00

325.00

375.00

450.00

Chrysler Corp.

450.00

550.00

650.00

800.00

Crucible Steel

275.00

325.00

375.00

425.00

Deere

475.00

550.00

600.00

725.00

Douglas Aircraft

425.00

475.00

650.00

700.00

General Electric

500.00

600.00

750.00

850.00

Goodrich, B. F., Co.

700.00

750.00

850.00

1000.00

Goodyear T. & R. Co.

750.00

800.00

1000.00

1300.00

Hertz

375.00

450.00

550.00

625.00

Illinois Central

350.00

400.00

475.00

550.00

Inter'l Nickel

500.00

525.00

725.00

825.00

Inter'l Paper

700.00

800.00

1000.00

1200.00

Inter'l Tel. & Tel.

350.00

400.00

475.00

575.00

Jones & Laughlin

475.00

525.00

625.00

725.00

Kennecott Copper

650.00

700.00

825.00

975.00

Martin

475.00

525.00

700.00

825.00

Montgomery Ward

300.00

350.00

425.00

475.00

N. Y. Central

250.00

300.00

350.00

425.00

Northern Pacific

375.00

425.00

500.00

575.00

Pennsylvania R.R.

225.00

250.00

275.00

325.00

Richfield Oil

700.00

775.00

950.00

1050.00

Republic Steel

450.00

500.00

650.00

700.00

Schenley Ind.

300.00

350.00

400.00

500.00

Southern Pacific

500.00

525.00

650.00

725.00

Southern Railway

350.00

400.00

525.00

600.00

S. 0. of Calif.

350.00

400.00

525.00

600.00

S. 0. Co. of N. J.

375.00

425.00

550.00

625.00

United Aircraft

450.00

500.00

625.00

700.00

U. S. Rubber

450.00

525.00

650.00

725.00

U. S. Steel

500.00

550.00

750.00

825.00

Western Union

300.00

350.00

475.00

550.00

Westinghouse Elec.

500.00

650.00

800.00

900.00

Youngstown S. & T.

700.00

800.00

1000.00

1100.00

Orders for these or other contracts can be placed directly with us

"BUY FROM FILER, SCHMIDT & CO."

State and Federal tax must be added to the cost of call options.


Quotations Subject To Change Without Notice.

bearer transferable contracts endorsed or guaran­teed by member firms of the New York Stock Exchange and can be sold or transferred at will, like checks. The law requires that New York state and federal tax stamps be affixed to Call options but not to Put options; stamps so affixed are the same as if the stock in question had been sold in the market. The tax is based on the selling price of the stock, but is never more than $12.00 for the combined federal and state tax per each 100-share Call. The New York state tax is as follows:

On stocks—

to each 100-share Call contract;

100-share Call contract.

The federal tax is based on the dollar value of the stock specified as follows in the Call contract for each 100-share Call:

Federal Tax $.04 per $100 value $.04 any fraction above ½

as an example:

(.04/100.00 of $4000.00)

$40.00 STOCK = $1.60

40 ½ " = 1.60

405/8 " = 1.64

50 ½ " = 2.00

505/8 " = 2.04
The maximum federal tax is $8.

The combined maximum federal and state tax is $12 per 100-share Call.

Holidays

Options are never made to expire on a known holiday. The contract will be made to expire on the next business day after the holiday.

The Offering of Special Options

Besides arranging for the purchase and sale of new options on order, some option-dealers carry an inventory of option contracts which they offer for resale through newspaper advertisements, as on page 32 or by quotation sheets sent through the mail. The offerings may be limited in quantity and are offered "subject to prior sale or price change." Originally, these contracts are bought by an option-dealer in the expectation and hope that he can resell them. If the dealer holds a Call contract and the market favors him, he might very well be able to dispose of the contract at a profit. If the market declines, the option may prove to be a complete loss to the dealer, but this is a business risk that he takes.

THE ADVERTISING OR OFFERING OF SPECIAL OPTIONS

32

The converse of the Put option on U. S. Steel at 95½ which was offered when STEEL was selling at 94¾ is the Call offered in The Times ad on Jones & Laughlin at 715/8, running until August 21 for $650.

At the time this Call was offered, the stock was selling at 75, or 33/8points above the Call price, and the Call had 82 days to run. In other words, the Call already showed a gross profit of 33/8 points. Compare such an offering if you will with a newly made 90-day Call contract at the then current market price of 75 which was offered for $525. To make a profit on the newly made option, the stock would have to advance above 80¼ (not counting stock-exchange commissions). To make a profit on the special Call, the stock would have to advance to 781/8- That is, 715/8 —the Call price plus the $650 premium paid for the option.

Straddle Option

Example: A Put contract at 60 and a Call contract at 60. The exercise of one contract before expiration does not void the remaining option.

Example: Stock selling at 60 in the market. A Spread is a Put possibly at 58 and a Call possibly at 62. A Spread can be made at various distances from the market price, and the dollar cost price of the Spread contract varies with the Spread of the option prices.

$400. The difference of $200 would represent half of the spread between 58 and 62.

Straddle at 60 - Cost $600 Spread 58-62 - Cost $400

odd lots. Nevertheless, orders for 500- or 1,000-share options are common and orders for 10,000-share options occasionally come into the market. However, to buy options on such a quantity of shares is a job which the option-dealer must handle with care. To go to a seller of options and let him know that you have an order of that size would immediately arouse his suspicions and he would be reluctant to sell any options. So, in handling such an order, the option-dealer must try to fill his order 500 or 1,000 shares at a time, without disclosing the size of the full order. The same technique would probably be used on the floor of the stock exchange by a broker who had a large quantity of a stock to buy or sell. To disclose the size of his order would enable other brokers to "take

the market away from him," and he would then be able to complete his order only by bidding the stock up in the case of a "buy" order or marking it down considerably in the case of a "sell" order.

p.m. (New York time) on the date stated in the contract, and they cannot be exercised by telephone but must be presented to the cashier of the stock-exchange firm that endorses the con­tract before the expiration time of 3:15 p.m. (New York time). A number of stock-exchange firms who have bought contracts for their customers, to avoid loss, insist on having instructions for the exercise of options well in advance of expiration time on the day that the option expires. In order to eliminate the chance of loss in late presentation of an option and to avoid delay when a con­tract is to be exercised, contracts should never be kept outside of New York City but should remain with your stockbroker or your option-dealer for safekeeping. The maker of an option contract will not accept it if it is pre­sented after it expires. When he sells the option, he agrees to live up to the terms of the contract but not beyond them. If the maker of a contract agreed to accept one pre­sented two minutes after it had expired, he might be asked

of an option, the following established rate will guide:

For buying or selling 100 shares of a stock at $50 per share, the commission is $44; for buying or selling 100 shares of a stock at $75 per share, the commission is $46.50; for buying or selling 100 shares of a stock at $100, the commission is $49.

In the closing or exercising of an option contract, by buying or selling stock in the market and exercising the option on the same day, the customer will be required to deposit with his stockbroker 25 per cent margin (instead of 70° per cent) or $1,000—whichever is higher—because such a trade is a complete and virtually riskless transaction. Some individuals who are far from an office of a stock-exchange firm or who have no account with one often do business directly with an option-dealer. The option-dealer will hold options for the account of a customer and will exercise the options upon instructions from the customer.

of the Dealer's transactions less two regular stock exchange commissions and any applicable tax. No margin has been required because the customer will have sold the contract itself to the Put and Call Dealer.

The customer who expects to buy options directly from

"Federal Reserve fixes margin requirements which are changeable.

an option-dealer should make a deposit with his option-dealer to open an account and thereby avoid any delay in the execution of orders when he desires to buy an option. Any options bought by the client will be debited against his account, and any profit arising from the sale of a contract by a client to an option-dealer will be credited to the client's account. Most dealers ask their clients to send their orders by wire, collect, because if a client gets an idea that a stock is going to move and wants to buy an option, the delay in sending an order through the mail could make him miss the move.

While option-dealers carry accounts for clients who want to purchase options, the making or selling of original Put and Call contracts must be arranged with a stock-exchange firm so that the contracts sold will carry that firm's endorsement. The option-dealer will be glad to help make such arrangements for those who do not already have an account with a stock-exchange firm but the option-dealer does not carry customers' securities and members of our association are not members of the New York Stock Exchange and cannot endorse options.

In the purchase of options, timing is most important. Many times, the customer has good information but buys 90-day options or 6-month options, only to have the stock move just after his option expires. For that reason it might be well to consider the purchase of option contracts on the stagger system so that the expiration dates occur a week or so apart. Buy some of your options this week, some next week, etc., as far as you want to go, so that if the first set of options is bought too early, it is possible that those bought subsequently can prove profitable. It is also good policy to

buy an option of longer duration than you think you need. If you think that a move may take place in 60 days, it is smart to buy an option for 90 days. The cost of the longer option will ordinarily be very little more.

For many years prior to 1935, options were dealt in for periods of 2 days, 7 days, 15 days, and 30 days—rarely longer. The short-term contract is now quite obsolete-most of our current business is in contracts for 60 days, 90 days, and 6 months. The 6-month option is usually made for 6 months and 10 days to take advantage of the long-term gains provision of the tax law.

The option business is a little different from the stock-exchange business. In the latter, if you want to buy 100 shares of U.S. Steel, you place your order with a broker who, through his man on the floor of the exchange, can buy or sell the stock in a matter of minutes. A ready market will be quoted, e.g., 691/2 bid offered at 70. That means that there is a ready market where you can sell stock at 691/2 or buy stock at 70. In the over-the-counter market, if you want to buy or sell an unlisted stock such as an insurance or a bank stock, a dealer in those issues will quote you a firm market and will trade immediately. Not so in the option business—here almost all quotes are nominal and subject to being filled, and every trade must be consummated individually and by phone. It may be that when an order is placed to buy or sell an option, as many as fifty phone calls will have to be made by the option-dealer before a trade is completed. He may have to make phone calls to Detroit or Chicago or anywhere in the country. Only through an option-dealer's knowledge

of the business can he quote with any accuracy the market on any issue for an option, and only through this knowl­edge and his contacts can he fill his orders for options with the least delay. Contracts are sometimes offered "firm" for a few minutes and, occasionally, a contract will be offered overnight. The option-dealer usually keeps a file system listing clients who have signified that they have an interest in selling options on various issues, and it is this list of possible sellers of options that the dealer con­tacts when he has orders to buy either Puts or Calls.

Uses of the Put Option Contract

In all of the following examples, for the sake of better understanding, I will try as much as possible to use one figure for the price of the stock and one figure for the cost of the option. Understand, please, that these prices change in actual practice. The cost of an option on a stock selling at 50 would be less than one selling at 80 and, likewise, the cost of an option for 90 days would be less than one for 6 months on the same stock. The price of an option usually depends on the price of the stock, the duration of the option, the volatility of the stock, and supply and demand for the options in question.

Buying a Put Option for Speculation

option would cost, he might receive a nominal quote of, say, $350 for a Put at the market for 90 days. Most options are negotiated "at the market," which means at "the current market," when the option can be obtained by the option-dealer. Suppose that the stock is selling at 50 and the quoted price of $350 is satisfactory to you. You enter your order: "Buy a 90-day Put on 100 XYZ [the name of the stock] for $350." If you are trading through your stock-exchange broker, he will give your order to an option-dealer who will contact one of his clients who sells options on that stock and will attempt to buy the option for you. When, after this contact or several others, he has obtained the Put option for you, he reports to the stock-exchange broker who gave him the order, and he in turn reports to the customer: "Bought Put 100 XYZ at 50 expires Decem­ber 30 for $350." Let us say that the man who bought the Put option, expecting a decline in the stock, was wrong, and that the stock, instead of going to 30 (as he expected), advanced to 70 and was selling there when his option expired. He would have lost the $350 that he paid for his Put option. Bear in mind that the limit of the man's loss was the cost of his Put option, or $350, no matter how high the stock rose and no matter how wrong he was, and that he would draw on the equity in his account to that extent only. Suppose, on the other hand, he had sold the stock short in the market. His loss would have been 20 points and still no knowledge as to the possible extent of loss until he covered the short sale. But in the purchase of the Put option his account would read:

Bought Put on XYZ at 50 for 90 days: Loss $350

Remember, too, that no trade has been made in the stock, so no stock-exchange commission has been paid. A regular stock-exchange commission is charged by your broker only if a transfer of stock is made in connection with the option.

On the other hand, suppose the man's judgment was correct and the stock declined to 30. If he had instructed his stockbroker to buy 100 shares at 30 and exercise his Put option, his account would look like this:

Sold 100 shares at 50 (through exercise of Put) $5,000

Total Receipts $5,000

Bought 100 shares in market at 30 3,000
Bought Put at 50

Cost 350

Total Cost 3,350

Profit on trade $1,650

The profit then would be almost 500 per cent of the cost of the Put contract. The profit is the difference between the cost of the stock plus the cost of the Put option and the proceeds of the Put that was exercised.

In all of these examples showing the use of options, the commission cost has been ignored. But at no time could the loss have been more than the cost of the option— $350—and any stock-exchange commissions would have been paid out of profit or out of possible recovery of part of the premium which was paid.

Trading in Odd Lots Against a Put Option

In the aforementioned example of trading against an option, the trading was done by buying 100 shares of stock

43

at 30 and selling the stock at 50 through theexercise of a Put option.

Another way of operating against such a Put option is to buy stock in odd lots of, say, 25 shares each on a scale-down as follows: the holder of a Put at 50 might buy 25 shares at 36, 25 shares at 34, 25 shares at 32, and 25 shares at 30. Of course, each purchase in the market must be margined according to stock-exchange regulations, but the man who has no definite opinion as to where the stock should be bought against his option "scales" his buying orders until he has bought 100 shares, and then he may, if he cares to, deliver these shares against his Put option contract.

His account would then read:

Bought 25 shares at 36 cost $ 900.00

Bought 25 shares at 34 cost ........................... 850.00

Bought 25 shares at 32 cost ........................... 800.00

Bought 25 shares at 30 cost ........................... 750.00

$3,300.00
Cost of Put ................................................ 350.00

$3,650.00

Sold 100 at 50 through exercise of Put............. $5,000.00

Profit $1,350.00

Trading Several Times Against an Option

Suppose that instead of expecting a severe decline, the

trader expected that we would for the next few months have a market that would be a "trading market," one that would fluctuate mildly. The ability to use an option to trade against can be quite profitable to the holder, for many trades can be made against the same option, and each time a trade is made, that trade is fully protected against unlimited loss if the trader's judgment should be wrong. For example, let us say that a man buys a Put option on 100 shares at the current market price of 50 for 90 days for $350. In a few days the stock declines to 46, and the trader, feeling that the drop has been enough for the moment, buys 100 shares at 46 through this stock­broker. He must deposit the normal margin required for such a purchase as the option cannot be used for margin. In making such a purchase, he is guaranteed against loss because the holder of the Put option can, up until the expiration of the Put contract, deliver his stock at 50 at his option. Now he is holding 100 shares which cost 46, and since his Put option guarantees that he can sell it at 50, he is assured of no loss. Say that in the next week or so the market rallies and the stock rises to 51 and the trader decides to sell. To recapitulate: the trader bought stock at 46 and sold it at 51, yet he still retains his Put option, which does not expire for some 70 days. He has made a gross profit of five points and may have further opportunity of making additional trades—and each time he buys stock under the price of his Put during the life of his option contract, he is guaranteed against loss.

45

have another chance to take a profit. The number of opportunities to make such trades is limited only by the fluctuation of the stock in the market and the trader's ability to judge the stock's movements. The reader should realize that it might be possible to make many such trades during the life of an option. Note that a trade or trades against an option do not nullify the option contract. The contract is operable until it expires or is exercised.

Buying a Put Option to Protect a Profit

A man owns 100 shares of stock which he bought at 30 four months ago. Now the stock is selling at 50. Con­cerned about conditions but feeling that his stock can do still better, he buys a Put contract at 50, good for 90 days, for $350. I would like to call the attention of the reader to the fact that the $350 paid for the protective Put can easily be more than made up by the fluctuations of the stock in the next 90 days.

On the other hand, let us suppose that when the Put expires, the stock has advanced to 70. While the buyer then allows his option to expire (he wouldn't Put stock

at 50 when he can sell it in the market at 70) the 20 points appreciation in the stock has more than made up the cost of the Put. Only if the stock is at about the same price of 50 when the option expires will the $350 paid for the contract be an actual loss. Even then it must be admitted that the Put has furnished protection during the period of the option.

Note that the holder of an option will and should exercise his contract even if the exercise will return to him only part of the cost. If the holder of a Put at 50 finds that at expiration the stock is selling at 48, or even 49, the con­tract should be exercised so as to recover part of the premium instead of losing all of it.

Sold Stock at 50 by exercising Put .................... $5,000

Bought Stock in market at 48 ................................... 4,800

Profit on Stock....... $ 200

Loss between profit on stock & cost of Put Option . $ 150

Buying a Put Option to Protect an Initial Commitment

47

contract. To be practical, let us see what happens if the stock goes up to 70, as he expects, or what happens if he is wrong and the stock goes down to 30. In the first instance he would sell out his stock at 70 and let the Put option lapse, and his account would read:

Bought 100 shares at 50............................................. $5,000

Bought Put 100 shares at 50-cost............................. 350

Total Cost .......... $5,350

Sold 100 shares at 70 .......................................... $7,000

Profit .................... $1,650

If he had been wrong and the stock had declined to 30, his account would have read:

Bought 100 shares at 50 .......................................... $5,000

Bought Put 100 shares ...................................... 350

Total Cost............ $5,350

Sold 100 shares at 50 (through Put) ................... $5,000

Loss .................. $ 350

Note that he sold his stock at 50 (at cost) through the terms of his Put contract, even though the stock had de­clined to and was selling at 30.

Special Tax Factors Covering Put Transactions

48

stock at 50 and at the same time he bought a Put at 50). The first type of transaction brings into play a special rule of the federal income tax law; the second type of transaction brings into play an exception to that rule. The special rule states that if a taxpayer makes a short-sale of stock and (1) if at the time of making the short-sale he has held the same stock for not more than 6 months, or (2) if, while the short-sale was open, he has acquired more of the same stock, there will be two consequences:

First, any gain on closing the short-sale will be a short-term capital gain, even though the short-sale is closed by the delivery of stock that, at the time of delivery, has been held for more than 6 months.

Second, the holding period of the stock that at the time of the short-sale had been held for less than 6 months or had been acquired while the short-sale was open, starts on the day the short-sale is closed. The length of time that the stock was held before the short-sale was made and the length of time it was held while the short-sale was open are ignored.

In the first example, the stock which had cost 30 had been held for only 4 months when the Put was bought. If the taxpayer had made a short-sale instead of buying a Put, the special rule would have become applicable. Since the acquisition of a Put, under these circumstances,

49

is the making of a short-sale, such acquisition made the special rule applicable. If, when the Put expires, the market is 70 and the trader sells his stock at 70 at a time which is more than 6 months after the date of the acquisi­tion of the stock, but not more than 6 months from the date on which the Put expired, his gain will be short term, despite the fact that he has actually held the stock for more than 6 months.

If, however, he did not buy the Put until after his stock had been held for more than 6 months, the special rule would not apply for the reason that the conditions that bring the rule into play would not exist; i.e., the Put was not acquired at a time when stock had been held for not more than 6 months nor was any stock purchased while the Put was in force. Consequently, any gain on the sale of the stock, whether from a sale in the market (at a price above the price in the Put) or delivery upon exercise of the Put, will be long term.

If, when the trader buys a Put on 100 shares, he has two lots of the same stock—100 shares which he has held for more than 6 months and 100 shares which he has held for not more than 6 months—a peculiar situation comes about. If the trader exercises the Put, he must be careful which lot of stock he delivers. If he delivers the lot which has been held for more than 6 months at the time he purchased the Put, he will have a short-term gain on the exercise of

the Put; and if within 6 months of exercising the Put he sells the other lot, he will have a short-term gain on the latter sale, also.

This unusual situation comes about as follows:

one lot of stock has been held for not more than 6 months.

If the trader had exercised the Put by delivering the lot which had been held for not more than 6 months at the time of the purchase of the Put, the gain on the closing of the short-sale would still be short term but he would be left with the lot that had been held for more than 6 months; this lot would not have lost its holding period, and when it was later sold, the gain would be long-term.

Purchasing a Put Option to Maintain a Short Position

51

these funds. How can he withdraw these funds from his account and still profit by a further decline of the stock? If he covers the stock that is short, he will no longer need margin for that short sale, and he can withdraw his funds. He then buys a Put option at 50 (the market) for 90 days for $350.00. If before the expiration of the Put option the stock declines to 30, he buys stock in the market at 30 and delivers it against his Put contract at 50. He has accom­plished two things—he released the margin that he needed for his business or something else and through his Put contract was able to share in the further decline in the market—all with the risk limited to the cost of the option. This operation brings to mind the oft quoted adage: You can't have your cake and eat it—but in this case you can.

Buying Stock to Make a Long-Term Gain and Protecting the Commitment

In other words, if the stock is selling at 50 and you buy 100 shares of stock at 50 and at the same time (that is,

the same day) buy a Put good for over 6 months, you are allowed to carry the stock fully protected by the Put for the duration of the option (of course, the stock must be properly margined). If at the end of 6 months and a few days the stock has risen to, say, 75, you can sell out your stock, and your profit is long-term gain. In this case, the holding period of the stock is not affected by the purchase of the protective Put option.

If, on the other hand, by the expiration of the Put the stock has declined to 30, you exercise your Put at 50, and your loss is limited to the cost of your Put option plus stock-exchange commissions and taxes. In this case you have had an opportunity to make an unlimited long-term gain with a risk limited to the cost of your option and commissions. How else could you have an opportunity to make a possible unlimited profit with a small limited loss?

A Put Option vs. a "Stop-Loss" Order to Protect a Purchase

Mr. B., on the other hand, buys 100 shares at 50 and at the same time enters a "stop loss" order at 46. Such an

order becomes an order to sell only if the stock sells at 46, and then it becomes an order to sell at the best price obtainable. If such an order is executed or "touched off," Mr. B. will probably get 46 or less for his stock—a loss of about $400 and he is out. His loss is greater than the cost of the Put option which Mr. A. bought, and he cannot benefit when the stock rises to 60. See the difference?

Using a Put to Make a Long-Term Gain in a Declining Market

profit, that profit would be a short-term gain. The only way that a long-term profit can be made in a falling market is through the purchase of a Put option good for over 6 months and the sale of the contract itself after it has been held over 6 months if the decline in the stock in question is great enough to show a profit. As an example:

he has held for over 6 months and the profit will be a

long-termcapital gain. The option-dealer will exercise the contract for his account and will sell the corresponding stock in the market (in the case of the Call), or will buy the stock in the market (in the case of a Put). The pur­chase price which the option-dealer will pay will be equal to the net proceeds of the dealer's transactions less two regular stock exchange commissions and any appli­cable tax.

How Option Orders Originate

Before going into the further explanation and applica­tion of options, it might be interesting to explain how orders for options originate and are executed. An interested

Explanation of Chart

U.S. STEEL

A look at the accompanying chart of U.S. Steel common shows that it broke from 72 in the second week of July, 1957, to 48¼ by the third week in December of the same year. From 48¼ it rose in almost a straight move to just under 100 in January, 1959.

In the examples that I use as illustration, people might say that I am using only favorable ones. I am using not only examples of options that were profitable to the buyer but also those where the buyer of the option was wrong and lost his premium money. Some of the examples are taken right from the records and are options that were actually sold at the time and at the price mentioned.

On July 23, 1957, when U.S. Steel was selling at 70½, 6-month-and-10-day Puts were sold at 70 ½ for $475 per 100-share Put. The Puts expired on February 3, 1958, and on that date the stock sold at 56. The Put contracts could have been closed out on that date with a profit of $1,450, less the cost of the option and commissions for buying and selling the stock. Of course, during the life of the option, the stock sold for as little as 48¼. Had the holder of the option seen fit to close out his option in mid-December, he could have bought stock at 49 and exercised his option before expiration, showing a profit of $2,150. Even if the man's judgment of the market had been wrong—but it wasn't—his loss would have been limited to the cost of the Put option.

If someone had been farsighted enough to buy Calls on U.S. Steel in mid-April, 1958, when steel was selling at 56, his profit could have been enormous. On April 16, 1958, Calls were sold at 57 5/8, expiring in 6 months and 10 days (October 27, 1958), for $450 per 100-share Call. On October 27 the stock sold at 87, and if the Call had been closed out on that date, the profit would have been $2,937.50, less the cost of the option and stock-exchange commis­sions for buying and selling the stock. The owner of such a Call does not necessarily have to sell the stock after he Calls it—he may see fit to Call it and carry the stock, looking for a higher price at which to sell it. Of course, in calling the stock and carrying it, he will be required to margin the stock properly with his stock-exchange house.


party—perhaps in Detroit—will ask his stockbroker to ascertain on what terms a Call option can be had on a certain stock for, let us say, 90 days. The stockbroker will find this out through his New York office, which in turn gets in touch with an option-dealer for the terms on which a Call option can be had on that particular issue. The option-dealer might quote the contract at a nominal price of $400. This quotation is sent back to the customer in Detroit, and if the quotation meets with his approval, an order will be given to the option-dealer to "buy Call on 100 XYZ at market for 90 days for $400." On receipt of such an order, the option-dealer will get in touch with his clients who might be interested in selling such a contract, and when he has been successful in negotiating the trade, he will report to the stock-exchange firm from whom he re­ceived the order: "Sold you Call 100 XYZ at 70 for 90 days for $400 expires October 24." The Call option contract is then delivered to the stock-exchange firm which gave the order and the latter will pay for the contract from the customer's account and hold the contract, subject to instructions by the customer before expiration as to whether or not the option should be exercised. (The cost of federal and state tax will be added to the cost of a Call option. There is no tax required on a Put option.)

If the customer wishes to have the option exercised and it happens to be a Call on XYZ at 70, his instructions to his stockbroker will read: "Exercise Call on 100 XYZ at 70 expiring October 24 and sell stock at market;" or if he wishes to exercise his Call contract and carry the stock in his account his instructions should read: "Exercise Call on 100 XYZ at 70 expiring [date] and carry stock in my account."

Of course, if he chooses to carry the stock, he will be obliged to margin it according to stock-exchange require­ments. If he exercises the Call and at the same time sells the stock, he will be required to deposit only 25 percent

Uses of the Call Option Contract

The Use of a Call Contract for Speculation

59

50, is going to have a substantial rise. He buys a Call option on 100 shares at 50, good for 90 days, for $350 plus tax. The federal and state tax departments demand that tax stamps be affixed to Call options (but not to Puts). This tax, paid for by the buyer of the option at the time he buys it, is the same amount that would be paid by a seller on a sale of the stock at the Call price. The maximum is $12 per 100 shares and is fixed according to the dollar value of the stock involved. When the trader buys the Call option at 50, good for 90 days, for $350, this amount is the most he can lose, no matter what happens to the stock. If the trader is correct in his judgment and the stock rises to, let us say, 70, before his Call contract expires, he buys the stock by exercising his Call and sells the stock in the market at 70. His profit is $2,000 less the cost of the Call contract, and his account shows:

Bought call 100 XYZ at 50 for................... $ 350

Bought 100 shares at 50 thru Call................ 5,000 $5,350

Sold 100 shares at 70 ................................... $7,000

Profit.............. The transaction shows a profit of almost 500 per cent of the $350 at risk.

60

is to his advantage to do so. The seller or maker of the contract has no choice—he must live up to the terms of the contract at the option of the holder of the contract.

Closing Out a Contract for Partial Recovery

The preceding example of a Call contract for specula­tion showed a handsome profit. Suppose that when a Call option at 50 was about to expire the stock was selling at 52. While the holder of the Call contract could not recover all of his premium of $350, he could, nevertheless, Call for his stock at 50 and sell it in the market at 52, so instead of losing the $350 premium, he would recover $200 of it.

His account would read:

Bought Call XYZ at 50-cost................................ $ 350

Bought 100 shares a/c Call ................................ 5,000

$5,350

Sold 100 shares in market 52............................... $5,200

Loss.................... $ 150

(For simplification Stock Exchange commissions have been omitted.)

Selling Stock and Buying a Call to Maintain a Position

needs the money in his business. However, he does not like to lose his stock position. He might consider the fol­lowing: He sells his stock at 50, releasing his funds, and at the same time buys a Call option at 50 good for 90 days at a cost of $350.00. If the stock advances, he exercises his Call and thereby re-acquires his stock. He may then sell the stock that he acquired through the Call and take his

profit, or he may care to carry the stock at 50 which is now selling in the market at 60. If, on the other hand, the stock declines to 40, he lets the Call option expire and now he can, if it suits him, re-acquire at 40 the stock that he sold in the market at 50. Through the Call contract, he accomplished two things—he released the $5,000 that he had invested and also had control over the same number of shares for the duration of his option, and at the same price that he sold them.

The Use of a Call Contract for Trading Purposes

Suppose a trader bought a 90-day Call option at the current market price of 50, for which he paid $350, and that the contract was to expire on December 31. Let us also suppose that some time in October the stock rose to 55, at which point the trader sold short 100 shares. This short-sale—and it must be sold as "short" stock—must be mar­gined with his stock-exchange broker, but at this point the trade is risk less. The trader has a 5-point profit less the cost of the Call at any time that he cares to exercise his option. But he doesn't care to exercise his option because it has about 2 months to run and the fluctuations in the market price of the stock in that 2-month period may give him additional opportunities to trade. Let us say that after having made the short-sale at 55, the market declines in another week or so to 50, where Mr. Trader sees fit to buy in or cover his short-sale. His account now looks like this:

62

Sold 100 shares at 55.............................. $5,500

Bought 100 shares at 50............................................. $5,000

Cost of Call Option .................................................. 350

Total Cost .... $5,350

Profit .................... $ 150

But the Call runs until December 31, and the trade which was made does not nullify the option. In another week or so, because of some news, the stock rallies to 56, where Mr. Trader again sees fit to sell short. Again he has a riskless, profitable transaction, and in a week or so the stock again declines to 50, at which point the short-sale is covered. On this trade another profit of $600 is added to the $150 already made.

Sold 100 shares at 56 ....................................... $5,600

Bought 100 shares at 50 ......................................... 5,000

Profit................... $ 600

63

a profit. Just as a Call can be used to protect a trade for trading purpose, Call options can also be used to:

Protect a Short-Sale at Time of Commitment

A man feels that a stock now selling at 50 will decline and sells 100 shares short in the market. Not willing to risk an unlimited loss if the stock advances, he buys a Call option at 50, good for 90 days, for which he pays $350. He is now guaranteed through the terms of his Call that he can buy 100 shares at 50 at his option before the con­tract expires, so if he is wrong, his loss will be limited to the cost of his Call option.

Now let's look at the operation both ways: Let's see what happens if the man is right and the stock declines and if he is wrong and the stock goes up instead of down. If the stock should go down to 30, as the man expects, he covers his stock in the market at 30 and takes his 20-point profit. Naturally, he won't want to exercise his Call option to buy stock at 50 because he can buy it better in the market, so he allows his Call option to lapse. He:

Sold 100 shares at 50 .......................... $5,000

Bought 100 shares at 30................................. $3,000

Bought Call at 50 ..................................................... 350

$3,350
Profit.............. $1,650

One might say that he could have made the short-sale without having spent $350 for the protection. Certainly— but suppose that instead of the stock going down to 30, it had gone to 55, 60, 65, and then 70. What then? How far do you let your loss run? Well, some would say, why not sell the stock short and put a "stop loss" order in at 53½?

64

If the stock declined to 30, he would have saved the $350 and his profit would have been $2,000 instead of $1,650. That's fine, but suppose the stock rose to 54 first, stopped out the man's short-sale with a loss of $350 or $400, and then declined to 30. His original idea was correct—the stock did decline to 30—but the stop-loss order for protection was more costly than the Call option. If he had had the Call option, the rally to 54 would not have worried him because he would have been guaranteed through his con­tract that he could cover at 50, but the stop-loss order caused him a quick and definite loss.

The Use of a Call Option to Average

65

he sold both the stock that had cost him 40 and the stock that had cost him 20, which he had on Call, his account would look like this:

Bought 100 shares at 40 .................... $4,000

Bought Call 100 shares at 20 .................... 225

Bought 100 shares at 20 a/c Call................ 2,000

$6,225

Sold 200 shares at 35 ................................... $7,000

Profit.............. $ 775

Protect Profit in a Call by Buying a Put

Or, say that in the remaining 30 days of his Call, the stock continues to rise and goes to 80. He then has a profit of $3,000 less the two premiums of $750, or a net profit of $2,250. This treatment can be varied by the purchase of two Puts instead of one.

66

The uses of options are limited only by ones ability and ingenuity.

Buying Stock and Call at the Same Time

A stock is selling at 50. and the man buys a Call at 50 on 100 shares for 90 days for $350. At the same time, he buys 100 shares in the market at 50 (which he must margin). If the stock advances to 55 in a few weeks and he sells his stock, he has made $500, less commission, which will about pay for the Call option. Now he has his option at 50 the stock is selling at 55 and the Call cost him nothing, with some time for the Call still to run. From here until the time the contract expires, he may trade to his heart's content above the Call price for he has his Call as protection. He may sell short at 60, cover at a lower price, then sell again and cover again as long as there is a profit. If the stock goes up after a short sale, he can always use his Call to cover his short sale.

Trading in Odd Lots Against a Call

their orders to sell against an option which they hold. For instance, take a man who owns a Call option on 100 shares at 50, good for 90 days, for which he paid $350; his idea of trading is to sell 50 shares short at 60, and maybe

Explanation of Chart

CHRYSLER

Take, for example, a man who bought 100 Chrysler on August 20, 1957, at 80. By November 20 (or in 90 days) he would have had a loss of $1,400, and in 6 months his loss would have been $3,000. Compare his position with that of a man who bought a 90-day Call contract on 100 Chrysler at 80 on August 20, at the market for $500. Let us suppose also that this last man bought a 6-month Call at 80 on August 20 for which he paid $750. Neither the 90-day Call nor the 6-month Call would have shown a profit. The man who bought the Call options was as wrong in his market judgment as the first man, and he lost the money that he paid for the Calls—but that money was the limit of his risk. Now, after Chrysler declined, the man who had bought the Calls instead of the stock and had drawn from the equity in his account only the cost of the Call contract, was in a position to buy the actual stock at a much lower price than when he first became bullish on it. Even though the purchase of the Calls was unprofitable, it saved him from buying the stock at the original high price.

As another example, suppose a man was bullish on Chrysler in the third week in July, 1958. The stock, according to the chart, sold at 46½. At that time he could have bought a 90-day Call contract at 46½ (the price at which it was selling) for $350. During the life of the Call the stock advanced, and in the third week in October, when his Call expired, the stock sold at 58. He could have exercised his Call at 46½ and at the same time sold the stock at 58, thereby making approximately 11½ points, less the cost of his option and commission for buying and selling the stock.

The records show also that 6-month-and-10-day Calls were bought on October 24, 1958, at 53½ for $600 per 100-share Call, when the stock was selling at that price. On May 4, 1959, when the Call expired, the stock was selling at 68, showing a profit of $1,450, less the cost of the Call and stock-exchange commissions for buying and selling the stock.


50 shares short at 65. Of course, he must deposit margin with his stockbroker to take such a position, and he may be able to trade back and forth before the expiration of the option and complete many trades. If, after selling 50 shares short at 60 and 50 shares short at 65, the market continues to rise to 70 or 75, he just exercises his option at expiration and his account will look like this:

Bought Call 100 shares at 50................ $ 350

Bought 100 shares at 50 through Call.... 5,000

$5,350

Sold 50 shares at 60 ...................................... $3,000

Sold 50 shares at 65 ...................................... 3,250

Total proceeds $6,250
Profit ............. $ 900

Notice the profit against the cost of the option (notice the leverage) and the percentage gain; at no time was the risk greater than the cost of the option contract.

Suppose that, before the Call expires and after selling 50 shares short at 60 and 50 shares short at 65, the stock declines to 45. At this point it would be more advantageous to the trader to buy the stock in the market to cover his short-sale than to exercise his Call option. He buys 100 shares at 45 to cover his short-sale and allows his Call to lapse. His account then looks like this:

Sold 50 shares at 65 ........................... $3,250

Sold 50 shares at 60 ............................ 3,000

Bought Call at 50 .......................................... $ 350

Bought 100 shares at 45 ................................ 4,500

$6,250 $4,850
Profit............. $1,400

The following illustrates this. A man who expects a stock which is selling at 50 to rise, buys a Call option at 50, good for 6 months and 10 days, for $500. Notice the price of $500 for a 6-month option as compared to a 90-day contract for $350. The proportion is about like that—double the length of the contract for about 50 per cent more. If the expected rise materializes and the stock goes to, say, 70 after Mr. Trader has held the contract for over 6 months, he sells his Call contract instead of exercising it. We (and most option-dealers) will always be interested in buying a profitable option; in such instances, we will purchase the Call and exercise it for our own account (50), and sell the stock in the market (70) for our own account. The purchase price which we will pay for the Call will be equal to our net proceeds ($2,000.00), less two regular stock exchange commissions and any appli­cable tax. In selling such a contract, it has not been necessary to deposit margin with the option-dealer. It is my understanding that, in such transactions, the selling option-holder has ordinarily treated the profit as long term capital gain on the sale of a contract held for more than six months.

It must be carefully noted, however, that if the holder of the contract exercises his option at 50 and at the same time sells the stock in the market at 70, such a profit is short-term gain by reason of the fact that the stock was held only one day. The holding period of the stock in this case does not date back to the time of the purchase of the option, but only to the time of actual acquisition of the stock.

Compare the two types of trades:

Bought Call at 50.................................................... $ 500

Sold Call at 50 with stock 70 2,000

Long-Term Profit $1,500

The tax on this would be 25 per cent or $375, leaving a profit after tax of $1,125.

If the Call had been exercised and the stock sold in the market onthesameday,theaccountwouldreadas

follows:

Bought Call at 50......................... Cost $500

Bought stock at 50 by exercise of Call.... 5,000

Sold stock in market at 70 ............................. $7,000

Short-Term Gain..... $1,500

If this man's income put him in the 75 percent bracket, he would pay $1,125 in tax and be left with only $375 net profit after tax. While this procedure is extremely inter­esting, so is the action taken by the holder of an option that proves unprofitable. If the 6-month option is allowed to lapse, the loss—the cost of the option—is a long-term capital loss. A loss was sustained on a contract which was held over 6 months. However, if the contract which looks as if it will be a loss is sold to another for a nominal sum before the contract is held for 6 months—say 5 months and 20 days, or anything up to 6 months—the loss is a short-term loss.

Bought Call at 50.................................................. $500

Sold Call .............................................................. 1

Loss........................ $499

As a side thought I would like to tell this story. It happened in November, 1957, after the market had had a severe break. A man with a southern drawl and wearing a big ten-gallon hat, walked into our office and wanted to speak to the "boss." "You know," he said, "I bought a lot of your Calls and I tore them up—lost my money." I thought maybe he was going to pull a gun on me. But my fear quickly vanished when he said, "Don't worry-how lucky it was that I bought Calls instead of stock. If I had bought the stocks way up there I would have gone broke." (The Dow Jones averages declined from 520 in July, 1957, to 420 in October.)

But to buy a stock or sell a stock short and be wrong can cost a lot of money.

The Renewal of Options

Just because one holds a Call or a Put option for 90 days is no reason to wait until the last of the option time to act upon it. Many times a stock will rise considerably above the Call price or decline much below the Put price during the time of the option, but the holder of the option who does not take timely advantage of the situation may find that at the expiration most of the profit that had been in the contract has disappeared. For example, the holder of a Call contract at 50 having 20 days left out of a 90-day contract, finds the stock selling at 65, at which price he would have a nice profit if he would close out the contract. But he waits until the last day or near the last day, by which time the stock has declined to 54, wiping out most or all of the profit. A contract can be exercised at any time before the contract expires'.

The Effect of Options on the Stock Market

75

3,000 shares of a stock at 50. If the market declines to 40, and the man who owns the Put option is satisfied with such a profit, he may be a buyer of stock on a scale-down—500 at 40, 500 at 39, 500 at 38, and so on-until he has bought the 3,000 shares of stock covered by his Put option. His purchases strengthened the market on that stock.

Call options also have a stabilizing effect on the market. The holder of Calls which are profitable closes them out by Calling or buying the stock which is specified in the Call contract and selling that stock in the market to complete the trade. A man who owns Call options becomes a sup­plier of stocks in a rising market. He sells the shares that he Calls in order to make his profit. Whether a man sells against his Calls in a rising market or buys against his Put options in a declining market, his actions are against the trend and, therefore, stabilizing and not destructive.

Effect of Dividends, Rights, and Stock Dividends

On the day that a stock sells ex a cash dividend on the exchange, the prices in all outstanding Put and Call options on that stock will be reduced automatically by the amount of the dividend. For example, the holder of a Put option and a Call option, both at 50, will, on the day that the stock sells ex dividend $1.00 on the Exchange, auto-

76

matically reduce both the Put and the Call option price to 49. While the holder of actual stock would be the recipient of such a dividend when it is payable, the holder of a Call option does not receive the dividend, but reduces the price of his Call option. Conversely, one who is short actual stock when it sells ex dividend would be charged for the dividend, while the holder of a Put contract reduces the price of his contract and pays the dividend only in the form of the reduced price when and if he exercises his contract.

In the case of rights issued on a stock, the prices in all outstanding options are reduced by an amount equal to the price at which the first sale of the rights is made on the day that the stock sells ex rights on the Exchange. Thus, if the first sale of the rights on the day the stock sells ex rights is 1V>>, then the price of outstanding Put and Call contracts would be reduced by 1% points. The stock at the opening on the day that the stock sells ex rights would probably open down l1/^ points so that there would be no advantage to either the buyer or the seller of the options.

Suppose that one owns a Put and a Call at 52 and the company has declared a 5 per cent dividend. From the day that the stock sells ex stock dividend the holder of the Call contract, if and when he exercises his Call, calls for 105 shares of stock for $5,200 (the dollar amount specified in the original contract) and the holder of the Put option, if he exercises his Put, will deliver 105 shares for $5,200 (the total dollar amount specified in the original contract).

As an example: the holder of a Call on 100 shares of

American Motors at 20, with stock selling at 40 after it has sold ex a 5 per cent dividend, would Call for 105 shares of stock for $2,000. Conversely, the holder of a Put on Amer­ican Motors at 20 if the stock were selling at 10 (after it had sold ex the 5 per cent stock dividend) would Put 105 shares of stock for the sum of $2,000. If the stock has sold ex a 50-cent cash dividend and then ex a 5 per cent stock dividend, the holder of the Call at 20 would reduce his Call price to 19^ and then Call for 105 shares for $1,950.

Percentage of Options Exercised

and bad options, for the matter of convenience we strike them all out." Don't hold me to the exact words, but that was the essence of it and it was my job to show the dif­ference. I think I did a good job. As I have said, the business of options was turned over to the newly formed SEC and, sitting before this body, I explained the difference between "the options in which we deal which are publicly offered and openly sold for a consideration, and the manipulative options that had been secretly given, for no fee but for manipulative purposes."

To get back to the reason for the heading of this section, Mr. Pecora, after other questions, asked me the percentage of options that were exercised, and I told him that about 12½ per cent were exercised at or before expiration. Re­member that in those days options were mostly of 30-day duration written not "at the market" price, but away from the market. In those days we also negotiated options for 2 days, 7 days, and 15 days. (More about this later.) But stock prices were high in the twenties (as we later found out), and with General Motors over $300, U.S. Steel over $325, and many stock in the hundreds, it was quite com­mon to trade options 20, 30, or even 40 points away from the market for 30 days.

Mr. Pecora then asked something like this: "If only 12½ per cent are exercised, then the other 87% per cent of the people who bought options have thrown their money away?" "No, sir," I said, "if you insured your house against fire and it didn't burn down you would not say that you had thrown away your insurance premium."

The same thing is true about options. Today the 30-day

option is a very small percentage of our business, and the longer contracts in which we now deal constitute a very much greater percentage of options exercised. However, whether an option is exercised at expiration or not, it does supply considerable protection and advantage to the holder during its life.

"Years Ago"

It might be interesting to the reader at this point, after reading so much of the techniques of the option business, to know something of "years ago."

When I first came into the option business forty years ago, and up until about the time of the "big break" in 1929, the holder of an option could trade against it with no margin. His broker had to have coverage for just the commissions and interest and any market difference. Often I had Puts on 500 shares against which I would

trade, back and forth, as many times as the swings in the market would allow; margin was not necessary because the option, guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange, was sufficient margin. Not so today, how­ever. Today all stock commitments must be covered by the required margin and the option is not a substitute for such margin.

"Years ago," there were no tax stamps required on either the Put or the Call option.

"Years ago," very few option-dealers had their own offices. The "market" was in a restaurant in New Street, New York City, where most of the option-dealers congre­gated, and many large writers and buyers of options would come to meet with their special option-dealers and give an order. There were telephone booths and a ticker in the restaurant, and the telephone booths were our offices. All the dealers walked around with a pocketful of nickels,

ready to use a phone to call a customer and try to make a trade. (A phone call was still a nickel in those days). Of course, we all ate in that restaurant—we had to, for a customer might call and this was our "office."

"Years ago," we did a very large business in "2-day options." We bought them for $25 or $30 per hundred and sold them for $35 or $37.50. They ran from, say, Monday— that would be at any time Monday that we traded—until Wednesday at 2:45 p.m.—the Exchange closed at 3:00 p.m. in those days. We would buy Calls on some stock 2, 3, 5, 10, or 20 points above the market for 2 days. But the number of points demanded for a Call was in proportion to the way the stocks were moving. And if you knew which pool was going to move which stock in the next 2 days, you could do well. There was a broker in the business who would sell a Call on 100 shares of stock good, for the next day only, for one dollar's worth of cigars (which were seven for a dollar, then). The idea was to buy one of those "seven-cigar Calls" and about noon the next day, if the stock had had a run, to sell it for $25 or more—just for the rest of the day. I saw one of my colleagues make $1,200 on a call like that.

82

days and stocks weren't split so quickly. Some of the leading stocks sold over $300—General Motors, Mexican Petro­leum, Texas Company moved 10-20-30 points in a day. I remember selling a man Puts on General Motors and Mexican Petroleum 30 points below the market for 30 days. Those Puts cost $137.50 per hundred shares, but the next day or so those stocks were down 40 points and the next day they were up 30.1 sold a fellow a Call on Radio once for 30 days at 100-the stock was 89 and the Call cost $137.50. There were 100 points in the Call when it was exercised.

"Years ago," I remember trading a Call on 10,000 shares of Pan American Pete at 11:00 p.m. at night. When I first started, I did the trading, I made out the contracts in ink—

who owned a typewriter?—I made out the checks, I delivered the contract, I picked up the checks and made the deposits, I opened the shop and closed the shop; I was the business. But all of the option-dealers did very well. After a while I chipped in with another broker and we hired a boy for $15 a week to stand at some phone booths in a nearby building (these phone booths were our branch office), and if we were wanted on the phones down the street our boy would come running after one of us "big shots" and whoever was wanted would run up to answer "his" phone. What fun if the restaurant phone wanted you at the same time!

But we had a peculiar sense of honor in those days. If I was sick for a time, one of my competitors would answer my calls and do business for me, and upon my return to work, he would give me a list of the trades he had made for me, along with a check for my profits. And though every one of us was a competitor and would try to offer an option better than the next fellow, the broker who took care of the sick fellow's customers would not, on the latter's recovery, solicit business from his fellow broker's customers. It just wasn't cricket. I had pneumonia once after I had been in business about four years. At the time I was trying to follow a buying pool—only I didn't know that it was selling in another place. I lost my money and worried about my wife and kid, and got sick and con­tracted pneumonia. I was home for about four weeks, one of my competitors took care of my business and wouldn't take more than a "thank you" for it.

While Istill had my office in my hat—I meanthe

restaurant—I made a trade in 500 shares with an English fellow I had seen around "the shop," and as he said, "I'll take it," he winked his eye. Trying to be careful because I couldn't afford to make a mistake, I asked him again if it was a trade and again he said, "I'll take it," but gave another wink. I went over to one of the boys and asked him about this fellow, who, every time he said, "I'll take it," winked at me. They reassured me that the sale was O.K.—he just had a nervous twitch—but I was scared.

Despite the length of time I've been in this business, I can remember almost all of the mistakes that were made in trading, they were that few. It's amazing because of the millions of shares of options that are traded: a Put is a Put and not a Call; 100 is 100 and not 500; and Steel is Steel and not Studebaker. I hope I don't jinx it, but I can't remember a serious mistake in our office in almost 10 years.

Just to show how mistakes were not made—often we would call a certain seller of options at his home at 7 p.m. (he was a fellow who had quite a thirst—so much so, that his tongue thickened) and we'd trade a thousand or two with him, and next morning our contracts would come in 100 per cent perfect—just as they had been traded. I don't think there is another business in the whole wide world that has had as few errors in the last forty years as the option business. And it's fast—we've over 50 phones on our trading table, and on a fast day the twelve ears and twelve hands that our six traders have can't stop for a minute; still, I think it should get an "Oscar" for being the least understood of all Wall Street businesses.

86






most favorable time to close their contracts, that if we would attend to not only securing the privilege, but the selection of the stock, and closing the same, using our best judgment, they would be willing to forward their money to us for investment. We reply, that when requested, we will not only secure the privilege, but make the selection of stock and the kind of contract best to be taken, and also attend to the closing of same, exercising our best judgment. We are enabled to do this without prejudice to our customers, as our business is done strictly on commission, and we are entirely disinterested when we give our views of the market, which we never do until after studying the movements of the different cliques, and watching the outside influences that may be brought to tear on the market. It is to our interest as well as our customers', to select such stocks as are most likely to pay the best profits, for as we make money for them, we make it for ourselves, by increasing our business; and all who trust us with their business may rest assured that we will attend promptly and faithfully to their interest.

present such facts before our readers from week to week as may come into our possession, and give them our best judgment as to the probable course of the market for the ensuing thirty days, and we say to them, if you choose to risk $106.25, you may realize a considerable profit. The stock broker who buys and sells for his customers can do no more than this. If he is con­sulted and is candid, he will tell his client what he thinks as to the pros­pects of a stock, desiring him at the same time to exercise his own judg­ment. He does not guarantee profits or promise success by any means. Those of our patrons who have followed the course of our suggestions, will agree with us when we state that our prognostications have generally proved correct, and when they have taken our advice, success has resulted in nine cases out of ten.

repay the losses on a great number of unprofitable ones. So the ball of speculation once in motion is easily kept rolling, and gains at every turn.

TUMBRIDGE & CO.,

BANKERS AND BROKERS, 2 "Wall St., N. Y.




SUGGESTIONS.

---------- ■ ♦—■

Ff you are undecided which way a stock is going, always take a " Spread ;" it costs $212.50, and pays a profit if the stock goes up or down.

To take an interest in several different stocks will generally be successful; in the numerous fluctuations which occur everyday, you are certain to make a handsome profit on some of them.

Where a stock has once been in price, you may look for it to sell there again at some time.

Short Of Stocks.—To be "Short (f Stocks," or a "Bear," means that you have sold for a decline, stocks, which you have not in your possession, but your Broker borrows for delivery.

Long Of Stocks.—The expression being " Long of Stocks," or a "Bull," means that you have bought for a rise, and that the shares are in possession of your broker.

Our long experience in stock operations gives us many advantages, and coming in contact with the great stock manipulators, we are often able to judge of the future market and give our customers very valuable information and advice, enabling them to act upon it.

We are always careful to make contracts on parties of undoubted responsibility, and our customers can always obtain the name of the party from whom we have bought or sold contracts or stocks for their account.

The best stocks to secure contracts on are those in which the greatest activity is anticipated. When requested, we will make the invest­ment in such stocks as, in our judgment, will give the largest returns, and will act for parties in securing the profits.

Contracts Left "With Us we will operate against either by buying or selling, in order to secure the various fluctuations of the day. Our customers are entitled to our services in the selection of the style of investment most likely to prove profitable for their account without extra commission charges.

If you think stocks are going down secure a Put; or you can obtain a Call and sell the stocks short against it.

If you think stocks are going up, secure a Call, or you can obtain a Put, and buy the stock against it.

When a telegraphic order is received by us and we have no funds to the credit oi the person sending such order, a check on New York, payable to our order, must be received by us by first mail.

We can always make returns the same day a contract is closed.

Extensions or renewals must be secured before the expiration of the original contract.

No Liability.—There is no liability, or risk, beyond the amount paid for a privilege.

Register all mone letters, send large amounts by express or draft on New York, and address all communications





demand the stock. If on the other hand the stock should de­cline, and not advance above the price named in the Call, the only loss that can possibly occur is the amount that may have been paid for the contract.


Every one per cent. Union Pacific advances above the price named, viz.: 43 is equal to $100 on each hundred shares, so an advance of five per cent., the contract would be worth Five Hundred Dollars, an advance of ten per cent, would be a thou­sand dollars, and so on. This is always the case. One per cent, on a stock that is worth in the market only 15, amounts to just as much as on a stock that is worth 110, because it is always the par value of a stock that is referred to, and not the selling value.

March 29th, 100 "0. P. sold C6, less 1/8 Commissions. $6,587.50

March 29th, 100 U. P., called at 43................................ 4,300 00

$2,287 50
Deduct cash paid for Call at 43 and Commissions......... 106. .25


Profit on the transaction................................................ $2.181.25








PUT contact is the very reverse of a Call—the holder having the right to deliver stock to the signer of the contract at a fixed price before its expiration. The maker of the contractistheonly party bound, so

Consequently the market or actual selling price of the stock when Put will be less than the Put price. If you hold " a Put," viz, the right to deliver Jones 100 shares of stock for which he agrees to pay you $4,500 and you can buy that stock in the market for $2,500, it is very clear you make the difference between $2,500 and $4,500. Therefore, when Puts are bought, a decline in the market is expected, and the profits are made from the decline. The details of a transaction of this kind, such as furnishing the money to buy the stock, and making the delivery to the signer of the contract, is always carried out by your broker. The last few years puts have resulted very profit­ably. Every time the market has advanced it has been follow d by a greater decline.



not closed until the day of its expiration, when the stock was selling for 61, at which price we bought 100 shares and delivered



THE SELLING OF OPTION CONTRACTS Selling Call Options Against a Portfolio

I remember lecturing in Chicago some years ago, and after this talk, during a question-and-answer period, one of my audience said, "I have bought options, but I never knew I could sell them." Well, for every trade—whether in options or clothing or real estate—there must be both a buyer and a seller. It is usually very interesting to my audiences to learn where options come from, who makes them, and why. I'll try to explain the selling of options, the advantages to the seller, the disadvantages, and the pit­falls, for I said at the outset that I would show the good side and the bad.

Options are sold by individuals, funds, trusts and insurance companies, and—as I like to say—by anyone who has what I call "a continuous portfolio of common stocks." One who sells options must be percentage-minded—the man who buys a stock at 50 and expects to get 150 for it is not a prospective seller of options, but the man who is satisfied to take a premium of, say, $300 and for that give a Call on his stock for 90 days, and then repeat that pro­cedure over and over again, is percentage-minded and could do well. It is my contention that the selling of options against a portfolio is no more speculative than is the owning of such common stocks.

Consider, if you will, a man (or an institution) who owns 1,000 shares of a stock selling at 50. He sells a Call, good for 90 days, at 50, for which he receives $300 per 100 share Call. This $300 he receives as soon as he sells

97

the option. Let's see what happens if the stock goes up, and also what happens if the stock goes down.

If the stock goes down and is below the Call price when the option expires, the Call will not be exercised. The seller of the Call will still have his stock and will have profited by the $300 which he received for the Option. If he can sell such an option four times a year (and there are four 90-day periods in a year), he will make $1,200 in premiums, or almost 25 per cent per annum on the $5,000 investment.

Let's look at the other side: the stock advances and the stock is selling above the Call price when, or before, the option expires. The stock is "Called" and the seller of the option must deliver stock at 50, less any dividends. He then has:

Sold 100 shares at 50 ....................................... $5,000

Received $300 for Call ........................................... 300

Total Received ... $5,300

It is just as simple as that and quite automatic. One shouldn't sell a Call at one time and for one expiration date

on all of his stock, but should try to sell a Call on part today, at today's price, and a Call on part of his holdings at a later date at the current market price in an attempt to have staggered prices and options expiring on different dates, like this:

Sold call 200 at 50, expiring June 20 Premium ................. $600

Sold call 200 at 52 expiring July 7 Premium .................... 600

Sold call 300 at 54 expiring July 18 Premium................... 900

I believe that there are two pitfalls to avoid in the selling of options: (1) Never sell a Call option unless you own the stock, and (2) Never sell a Put option without the where­withal to pay for the stock in case it is Put to you. Other­wise, the risk in selling options is no greater, in my opinion —arrived at through years of experience—than the risk in owning like common stocks. For instance, if one had sold Calls freely in the beginning of 1958 without owning the stocks, he could have been Called for stock at 50 when it was selling at 80. If one had sold Puts in the summer of 1957 without having sufficient cash to pay for the stock when it was Put to him, he might have had stock Put to him at 50 when it was selling at 30. The return to be had by selling options almost on an investment basis is inter­esting enough without looking for additional income and additional grief by trying to gain additional premiums.

Before going into the selling of Put options, Straddles, Spreads, Strips and Straps—a word about margins. The New York Stock Exchange has set minimum initial margin requirements for the sale of options by customers of its member firms. However, these member firms may increase these requirements according to house policy. The mini-

mum initial margin for the selling of a Put option is 25 per cent of the Put option price, unless the account is "short" the stock which is already adequately margined. The minimum initial margin requirement for the sale of a Call option is 30 per cent of the stock on which the Call is written, unless the Call is written on stock already "long," in which case the "long" stock is already adequately margined. The minimum initial margin requirement for the sale of a combination Put and Call (Spread or Straddle) where there is no stock position, is the larger of the two requirements for the separate Put or Call, or 30 per cent.

When an option is exercised, however, thereby creat­ing a stock position, the position must be fully margined according to stock-exchange requirements.

The Sale of Put Options

An individual (or a company) has $100,000 which he would invest in common stocks. He could buy these stocks in the market or he could sell Put options in an attempt to acquirethe stocksa few pointsbelow thecurrent

market price or to earn premiums from the sale of Put options against the money that he is willing to invest.

For an example: With a stock selling at 50, a man (or a company) sells a Put option at 50 for 90 days, receiving a premium of $300 for each 100-share Put contract. For the $300-premium which he receives at the time that he "makes" the Put contract, he agrees to buy 100 shares at 50 before expiration of the option if the holder of the option cares to deliver it to him. The maker of the Put has no choice—he must receive and pay for the stock if it is Put to him. The option is with the holder of the contract. If, before or at the expiration of the option the holder of the contract cares to deliver the stock, the maker of the option must buy 100 shares at 50, which price is reduced by the $300 he received for the option, making the cost to him 47. If the stock is above the Put price, the holder of the Put option will not deliver stock and the writer or maker of the option has benefited by the $300 received for the contract. Here, too, it must be remembered that if it is possible to sell four such Put options in a year (there are four 90-day periods in a year), the annual return will be $1,200 on a possible investment of $5,000.

The operation can be worked on a number of shares of stock or stocks up to the point where the total amount to be paid for the stocks (if the holders of the Puts exercise them), less the premiums received, equals the amount of cash held for investment. To illustrate:

101

100 A at 50.................... $5,000

100 B at 50...................... 5,000

100 C at 50...................... 5,000

100 D at 50...................... 5,000

100 E at 50................... 5,000

100 F at 50.................... 5,000

100 G at 50...................... 5,000

100 H at 50...................... 5,000

100 I at 50..................... 5,000

100 J at 50..................... 5,000

Total Cost..... $50,000

$3,000. At the expiration of the options, no Puts are exercised, and he has earned $3,000 on his possible invest­ment of $50,000 of cash he is holding for investment, at an annual rate of about 24 per cent.

If the Put options are exercised, he will have an account such as this:

Bought 100 A on a/c of Put ........ $5,000

Bought 100 B on a/c of Put ........ 5,000

Bought 100 C on a/c of Put ......... 5,000

Bought 100 D on a/c of Put ......... 5,000

Bought 100 E on a/c of Put ......... 5,000

Bought 100 F on a/c of Put ......... 5,000

Bought 100 G on a/c of Put ......... 5,000

Bought 100 H on a/c of Put ......... 5,000

Bought 100 I on a/c of Put ....... 5,000

Bought 100 J on a/c of Put ....... 5,000

Total Cost ........................ $50,000

Less Premiums Received... 3,000

Net Cost .......................... $47,000

Mr. A's list cost him $50,000, while Mr. B. has acquired the same stocks at a cost of $47,000. It isn't likely that the situation would work out this all-or-none way; probably some Puts would be exercised, some not. But the principle is clear.

Conversely, if a man owns stock which he would be willing to sell, he sells Call options, and the premium which he receives enhances the selling price if the Call is exercised; if it is not exercised, the premium adds to the income on the stock which he holds.

Buy 100 Shares and Sell Straddle or Buy 200 Shares

(1) At the expiration of the contract (neither side having been exercised prior to that date), the market price for the stock is just about the Straddle price. This rarely happens, but it can and sometimes does.

Neither the Put nor the Call is exercised and Mr. B. has gained the $700 premium.

(2) The stock is selling below 70, the Put price,
and Mr. B. will have 100 shares delivered to him on
thePutoption,whichwill makehispositionas
follows:

Bought 100 shares in market at 70.................... $7,000

Had 100 shares Put at 70..................................... 7,000

Net Cost ........................... $14,000

Less premium ........................................ 700

Net Cost of 200 Shares...... $13,300

(3) The stock is above the Call price (70) and Mr.
B. will have his 100 shares called from him at 70. His
account will look like this:

Sold 100 shares (through Call) at 70..................... $7,000

Sold Straddle 100 shares—premium...................... 700

$7,700
Bought 100 shares in market at 70........................ $7,000

Profit................ $ 700

The first situation needs no discussion as it rarely hap­pens. If it does, however, Mr. B. is at liberty to sell another Straddle, having profited by the premium of $700 on an actual investment of $7,000 and a possible invest­ ment of $7,000 on the outstanding Put option—or at the rate of 20 per cent per annum.

In the third situation, we know that Mr. B. made $700.

The owner of 100 shares of a stock may be willing either to buy more shares of the stock or to sell out at a premium. In such a situation he can sell a Straddle. A Straddle, as previously defined, is a combination of a Put and a Call, both at the market price of the stock. Let us say that a man sold a Straddle on XYZ at 50 for 90 days, and for it received $500 per 100-share Straddle. By selling the Straddle, he has contracted: (1) to sell 100 shares at 50 any time within 90 days when Called by the holder of the Straddle; (2) to buy 100 shares at 50 any time within 90 days if the holder of the Straddle Puts stock to him. If the Call is exercised, he will have sold his stock at 50 plus the $500 that he received for the option. If the Put is exer­cised, he will have bought stock at 50, which price is reduced to 45 by the $500 premium. But, you may ask,

105

cannot both the Put and the Call be exercised—first the Call before expiration and then, after the Call has been exercised and still before expiration, the Put? Yes, that can happen. A Straddle consists of a Put and a Call—both separate contracts—and the exercise of one does not void the remaining contract. What would be the result to the writer of the Straddle if both contracts were exercised? Well, in the example cited, the trader started with 100 shares. That stock was called, leaving him with no stock, but subsequently he had 100 shares Put to him, so after he sold 100, he then bought 100, and this brought him back to his original position of 100 shares. Finally, he was ahead by the $500 premium which he received.

Selling a Spread Option

On the other hand, if the stock declined and the Puts were exercised, he would have to buy 200 additional shares at 50, which price would be reduced to 461/2 on each 100 by reason of the $700 premium received. Therefore, the question must be asked by the seller of a Strip, "Would I

107

be willing to lose my stock at 57 and/or would I be willing to buy 200 additional shares at 461/2 ?" The increased premium for a Strip gives a higher selling price in case the Call is exercised. If the two Puts are exercised, the $700 premium received reduces the cost of the stock by 31/2 points for each 100-share Put. Whether a Straddle or a Strip should be sold (assuming that it is possible to sell a Strip) depends on the "market feel" of the seller of the contract.

Selling a Strap

The reverse of the Strip and, also, a cousin of the Straddle is the Strap. It is a form of option contract that was unknown a dozen years ago. It is merely a combination of a Put on 100 shares and Call on 200 shares. To make a comparison: if a Straddle—one Put and one Call—will bring a premium of $500, and a Strip will bring a premium of $700, a Strap will bring a premium of about $800. If the Calls are exercised, the seller of the Strap will have to sell 200 shares at 50, which price will be increased by the $800 premium to an average sale price of 54. However, if the market declines and the one Put is exercised, the maker of the Strap will have to "take" or buy 100 shares at 50, but this price will be reduced to 42 also by reason of the $800 premium which he received for the sale of the Strap.

Selling Call Options Against Convertible Bonds, Warrants, or Preferred Convertible Stocks

Sold 100 shares stock at 643/8.......... $6,437.50

Received for Call 100 shares ..... 500.00

Value of remaining shares (8.7)

(minimum value) .................. 560.00

will be above the Call price $7,497.50
Profit................. $497.50

A study of convertible features of securities might dis­close other such opportunities.

The Sale of 6-Month-10-Day-Options

The tax law says, in effect, that the premiums received from the sale of an option must be held in abeyance until the expiration or the exercise of the option. If the contract expires, the premium is ordinary income to the seller of the option. If the option is exercised and it is a Call, the premium is an addition to the proceeds of the sale and, hence, increases the gain, or decreases the loss, on the sale. If the option is exercised and it is a Put, the premium decreases the cost of the stock and, hence, will increase the gain or decrease the loss on the ultimate sale of the stock. The gain or loss on the sale of the stock may be either long term, or short term, depending on the length of time the stock has been held. If a 90-day Call option is sold on a stock after the stock has been held 30 days and the Call is exercised, the time of holding the stock would amount, in all, to approximately 4 months and the gain, if any (in­cluding the premium received for the sale of the Call), would be taxed as short-term gain. If the stock in question had been held for over three months when the Call was sold and the Call was exercised at expiration, then the stock in question would have been held for more than 6 months, and any profit, plus the premium received from the sale of the Call, would have been long-term gain. For that reason options are sold for 6 months and 10 days, or longer. It may be that the prospective seller of options

does not own the stock for which a Call is bid, but is willing to buy such stock and then sell the Call which is wanted. If a stock is selling at 50 and a 6-month-and-10-day Call contract is bid for, the prospective seller of the Call may buy stock in the market so as to sell the Call. Of course, if the Call is not exercised, the premium received is ordinary income.

But let us explore the tax possibilities if the Call is exercised. Let us assume that a man has bought stock at 50 and has sold a 6-month-and-10-day Call for, let us say, $500. The stock, held for more than 6 months, has gone up to 70 and is Called. The seller has a $500 long-term profit. However, the alert trader may be able to get a sizeable tax benefit. Before the Call is exercised but when the stock has been held for more than 6 months, he may sell his stock in the market and take a long-term profit of $2,000. But he still owes stock at 50 on account of the Call which he sold. After having sold his stock at 70 to take a long-term gain, he immediately repurchases stock at 70, and this stock he delivers on his Call a few days later, when the Call is exercised. He now has a $2,000 long-term gain and a short-term loss of $2,000, less the premium of $500 which he received for the Call—a $2,000 long-term gain and a $1,500 short-term loss.

Just as a buyer of an option can capitalize, tax-wise, on

a long-term option which he bought, so the seller of an option can benefit through proper treatment of options which he has sold. Of course, there is no guarantee that the holder of a long-term Call option will wait till the expira­tion of his 6 months "plus" before exercising his contract. It may be that a stock could go from 50 to 75 or 80 in half the life of the option, and the holder of the contract, not wanting to lose his profit, may exercise his contract. In such a case the holder of the stock on which the Call was sold may want to buy an additional 100 shares of stock to deliver against the Call and thus maintain his long position in the original stock until it becomes long-term gain.

A summary of the income tax treatment of premiums paid for by the buyer of options and those received by the seller of options has been added as an appendix. This review of tax treatment has been prepared by a leading New York tax-expert and is based on the 1954 tax law as amended and now current.

In conclusion, may I reiterate that I do not contend that all those interested in securities must trade in Put and Call options. I do feel, however, that this part of Wall Street procedure should be understood by all those who trade in securities, since a time may well come when such under­standing can be put to good use in their securities trans­actions. It is my hope that this book has shed light on the option business, for those who are interested in securities and knew nothing about options, and also for those who had just a little knowledge of the business and wanted to know more about it.

APPENDIX

OF "PUT" AND "CALL"OPTION

TRANSACTIONS

Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954

Revenue Ruling 58-234

Prepared by

© 1958 Put & Call Brokers & Dealers Association, Inc.

113

Description of Transaction

A. As to the purchaser (optionee) of put

1. Tax treatment of amount paid for put (premium)
prior to its being exercised or its expiration

2. Tax treatment of amount paid for put (premium)
when put is not exercised but is held to expiration

3. Tax treatment of amount paid for put (premium) when put is exercised

4. Acquisition of a put as a short sale

114

Income Tax Treatment

Amount paid is capital loss for the year in which the put expired by limitation of time. If put has been held for not more than 6 months loss is short-term. If it has been held for more than 6 months loss is long-term. (Specific provision in Section 1234 I.R.C. 1954.) But if transaction falls within exception in (5) the amount paid is an addi­tion to the cost of the related stock.

Upon exercise of put the purchaser (optionee) sells the property to which the put relates to the writer (optionor) for the option price. The amount paid for the put is a reduc­tion of the proceeds of sale.

115

Description of Transaction

I. PUTS (Continued)

A. As to the purchaser (optionee) of put (continued)

5. Exception if put is acquired on same date as related security is purchased

B. As to writer (issuer or optionor) of put

If put is acquired on the same day on which the security identified as intended to be used in exercising the put is acquired, and if the put, if exercised, is exercised through the sale of the property so identified, the acquisition of the put is not treated as a short sale. However, if the put is not exercised, the cost of the put must be added to the cost of the related stock (Section 1233(c) I.R.C. 1954). An informal and unpublished ruling holds that, if taxpayer sells the put instead of exercising it, the exception of Sec­tion 1233 (c) will not be applicable and the acquisition of the put will be considered a short sale.

Amount received is to be carried in a deferred account. No tax consequences until put is exercised or expires.

Description of Transaction

I. PUTS (Continued)

B. As to writer (issuer or optionor) of put (continued)

2. Tax treatment of amount received for writing or issuing put (premium) when put is not exer­cised but expires

3. Tax treatment of amount received for writing or issuing put (premium) when put is exercised by purchaser thereof

(a) Holding periodof security purchased by exercise of put by purchaser thereof

II. CALLS

A. As to purchaser (optionee) of call

1. Tax treatment of amount paid for call (premium)
prior to its being exercised or its expiration

2. Tax treatment of amount paid for call (premium)
when call is not exercised but is held to expiration

Amount received constitutes ordinary income for the year in which the failure of the holder to exercise the option becomes final. This is so, because, under Section 61,1.R.C. 1954, all income is ordinary income unless other­wise provided, and Section 1234, which deals with options to buy and sell, contains no reference to the gain from the failure to exercise an option.

Upon exercise of put, the writer (optionor) buys the security at the option price. The amount received for writing the option (premium) constitutes an offset against the amount paid in determining the net cost basis of the security purchased.

Holding period of the security purchased starts the date the put is exercised, and not the date the put was issued.

Amount paid is to "be carried to a deferred account as a capital expenditure made in an incompleted trans­action entered into for profit."

Amount paid is capital loss for the year in which the call expired by limitation of time. If call has been held for not more than 6 months, loss is short-term. If it has been held for more than 6 months, loss is long-term (spe­cific provision in Section 1234 I.R.C. 1954).

119

Description of Transaction

II. CALLS (Continued)

A. As to purchaser (optional) of call (continued)

3. Tax treatment of amount paid for call (premium)
when call is exercised

(a) Holding period of security acquired through exercise of call

4. Acquisition of call as short sale

5. Call as substantially identical property

6. Tax treatment if call is sold

B. As to writer (issuer or optionor) of call

1. Treatment of amount received for writing or issuing call (premium) prior to its being exercised or its expiration

120

Income Tax Treatment

Amount paid is an addition to the cost of the stock purchased on the exercise of the call.

Holding period of the security purchased starts on the date the call is exercised and not the date the call was acquired.

The acquisition of a call (unlike the acquisition of a put) does not constitute a short sale. Section 1233(b) does not relate to calls.

The call and the related security are not substantially identical properties. Hence, gain on sale of call held for more than 6 months is long-term gain, even though a short sale of the related security was made during period call was held. (Letter ruling dated February 27, 1957, published in Tax Services)

Gain or loss on sale is capital gain or loss (except in the case of a dealer); long-term if call has been held for more than 6 months, short-term if held for not more than 6 months. Short sale of related security does not kill holding period (see [5] above). (Section 1234, I.R.C. 1954)

Amount received is to be carried in a deferred account. No tax consequences until call is exercised or expires.

Description of Transaction

II. CALLS (Continued)

B. As to writer (issuer or optionor) of call (continued)

2. Tax treatment of amount received for writing or issuing call (premium) when call is not exercised but expires

3. Tax treatment of amount received for writing or issuing call (premium) when call is exercised

122

Income Tax Treatment

Amount received constitutes ordinary income for the year in which the failure of the holder to exercise the option becomes final. This is so, because, under Section 61,1.R.C. 1954 all income is ordinary income unless other­wise provided and Section 1234, which deals with options to buy and sell, contains no reference to the gain from the failure to exercise an option.

Upon exercise of call, the writer (optionor) sells the security at the option price. The amount received for writing the option (premium) is added to the amount received as the option price, in arriving at the gain or loss on the sale of the security. (IT 3835 C.B. 1947-1, p. 53)

123

Description of Transaction

III. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Adjustments for cash dividends, stock rights, stock dividends and stock splits

Income Tax Treatment

Under common trade practice, the purchaser (optionee) of a call who exercises it is entitled to receive from the writer (optionor) an amount equal to all cash dividends, regular or extra, plus the market value of all rights ac­crued on the security involved (determined on the basis of the first sale of rights on the day the stock sells ex-rights). To reflect this right, the option price is reduced by such amount and the purchaser (optionee) pays the writer (optionor) the adjusted option price. A similar adjustment of the option price is made in the case of a put. In that case, the price which the writer (optionor) pays the purchaser (optionee) is reduced by the amount of such cash dividends and the value of such rights. The number of shares to which the option relates is increased to reflect the additional shares which would be received during the life of the option on the shares originally covered by the option by reason of stock dividends or stock splits and the option price per share is correspond­ingly reduced, the total option price remaining unchanged. The cash adjustment for cash dividends and rights is not ordinary income but is a reduction of the option price, whether the option price is adjusted or the cash adjust­ment is made separately. (Revenue Ruling 58-234) (see also IT 4007, C.B. 1950-1, p. 11 and Revenue Rulings 56-153 and 56-211)

125